资源简介 (共23张PPT)POLITICAL ECONOMYChapter 6Political EconomyThe field that applies economic principles to the analysis of political decision-making.How well do various decision-making procedures translate the preferences of their citizens into collective action 6-*Direct DemocracyUnanimity Rulesr per year00’Adam’s share (SA)Eve’s share (SE)The Lindahl Modelr*S*Given efficient quantity level r* and demand curves, Adam pays 0-S* and Eve pays 0’-S*. Unanimity can result in efficient level if Lindahl price – tax share per individual – were allowed6-*Feasibility of Unanimity Rules in Reaching EquilibriumPractical problemsStrategic behavior: do people vote sincerely or under report value to escape tax liability Time to reach equilibrium given many citizens.6-*Direct DemocracyMajority Voting RulesMajority voting rule – one more than half of the voters must favor a measure for it to be approvedHowever, majority voting does not always yield clear-cut resultsGiven the voter preferences to the right, “B” always wins against opponentsVoterChoice Brad Jen AngelinaFirst A C BSecond B B CThird C A A6-*Majority Voting Does Not Always Yield Clear-Cut Results: Double- vs. Single-Peaked PreferencesVoting Paradox – Community preferences can be inconsistent even though individual’s preferences are consistentGiven new preferences at the right:A vs. B → A winsB vs. C → B winsA vs. C → C winsAgenda Manipulation – Process of organizing order of votes to ensure a favorable outcomeCycling – when paired voting on more than two possibilities goes on indefinitely without a conclusion ever being reached6-*VoterChoice Brad Jen AngelinaFirst A C BSecond B A CThird C B AGraphing PreferencesMissilesUtilityABCBradJenAngelinaSingle-peaked preferencesDouble-peaked preferences6-*Practical Importance of Double-Peaked Preferences: ExamplesCan occur with availability of private substitutes for a publicly provided goodExample: public park vs. private country clubCan occur with issues that can’t be ranked along single dimensionExample: abortion clinic vs.adult bookstore vs.Army recruitment office6-*Direct DemocracyThe Median Voter TheoremAs long as preferences are single peaked, the outcome of majority voting reflects the median voter preferencesHuey’s preference of $150 spending would prevail in majority voting6-*Direct DemocracyLogrolling I: Welfare ImprovedThe trading of votes to obtain passage of a package of legislative proposalsIf projects voted on 1 at a time, all loseHospital → only MelanieLibrary → only RhettPool → only ScarletSolution is for Melanie to vote for library if Rhett votes for hospital, etc6-*Direct DemocracyLogrolling II: Welfare LoweredWelfare lowered if vote trading leads to projects with negative net benefits being passed6-*Direct DemocracyArrow’s Impossibility Theorem“Reasonable” collective decision-making should be logical and respect individuals’ preferencesCriteriaIt can produce a decision whatever the configuration of voters' preferencesIt must be able to rank all possible outcomesIt must be responsive to individuals’ preferencesIt must be consistentIndependence of irrelevant alternativesDictatorship ruled out6-*Unfortunately, all conceivable voting schemes have some potential for being unfair or producing a paradoxical resultMeaning of theorem is that a fair, consistent rule is not necessarily impossible to find, but it is not guaranteed a society will find oneBuchanan’s critique: Despite being inconsistent, majority rule has other benefitsArrow’s theorem implies social welfare functions are useless, but most economists believe they provide valuable insights6-*Direct Democracy Arrow’s Impossibility TheoremRepresentative DemocracyElected Politicians06-*Implications of the Median Voter ModelThe candidate who adopts the median position (M) will defeat the candidate who adopts the position away from the median (S)Two-party systems tend to be stable because they stake out positions near centerReplacement of direct referenda by representative system has no effect on outcomes6-*Other Factors Influencing VotingNon-single-dimensional rankings cause median voter theorem to fall apartIdeologyPersonalityLeadershipDecision to vote6-*Representative DemocracyPublic EmployeesFunction of bureaucratsImplement policyProvide technical expertise in the design and execution of programs and policiesProvide “institutional memory”Provide accurate documentation to ensureEqual treatment for eligible citizensPrevent corruptionGoals of bureaucratsFulfill wishes of electorate and representativesPerhaps increasing power and their own perks6-*Representative DemocracySpecial InterestsEstablishment of Special Interest GroupsSource of Income: Capital or LaborSize of IncomeSource of Income: Industry of EmploymentRegionDemographic and Personal Characteristics6-*RentsRepresentative DemocracySpecial Interests and Rent-Seekingtons of peanuts per year$S=MCDMRRent: Higher than normal returns.Rent-seeking: Using government to obtain rents6-*Representative DemocracyOther ActorsJudiciaryJournalistsExperts6-*Explaining Government GrowthRatio of government expenditures to Gross Domestic ProductSources: Pommerehne (1977); OECD (2012a)6-*Explaining Government GrowthCitizen Preferences: G = f(P, I)G=Median voter’s demand of public sector goods & servicesP=Price of public sector goods and servicesI=IncomeMarxist ViewThe public sector must expand to absorb private excess production.Chance EventsWars, recessionsChanges in Social AttitudesIncome Redistribution6-*Chapter 6 SummaryPolitical Economy applies economic principles to analysis of political decision-makingMajority voting in a direct democracy as a method for choosing levels of public goods includes consideration of single- vs. double-peaked preferences, logrolling, and Lindahl pricingArrow’s Impossibility Theorem: a fair, consistent rule is not necessarily impossible to find, but is not guaranteedUnderstanding government behavior requires analysis of public employees, special interest groups and rent-seekingThe growth of government in various countries can be explained by citizen choice, random events, government’s need to absorb excess private production, ignorance of the opportunity costs of public programs, and efforts to use government to redistribute income6-* 展开更多...... 收起↑ 资源预览