资源简介

阅读理解（人工智能）押题
纵览高考命题思路，从来不缺少对科技行业的关注和思考。近几年来，人工智能俨然成为社会热点，人工 智能在教育领域的应用也具有巨大潜力。所以考生要熟悉阅读理解人工智能热点话题，掌握话题词汇。预
测 2024 年高考人工智能仍然可能会出现在阅读理解题中。
(
近
3
年新高考阅读理解（人工智能）数据分析
)
试卷类型 年份 体裁 话题
新高考 II 卷 2021 说明文 (
澳大利亚一名教授正在开发一种机器人， 用于
监测放牧牛的健康状况。
)
说明文多见于科普文章， 用以解释或揭示事物的状态、特征、演变、结果及其相互之间的关系， 这类文体的文章，首句往往是主题句，开门见山，说明文章的关注对象,弄清作者的思路和段
落组织的方式；把握次要信息及其与主题的关系。
（一）阅读的方法可以使用以下几种：
1.跳读：就是快速的一步阅读法。实际上是有选择阅读，找关键词。用这种阅读方法回答
who 、what 、when 、where 之类的问题最为有效。
2.略读：指比跳读慢些的二步阅读法。即泛泛地、粗略地快速阅读，目的是了解大意，对文章
有个总的概念。此种阅读方法能回答 why 、how 之类的问题。
3.精读：即最细致、最慢的深层阅读方法，目的是求得对所读文章的全部意义的理解与掌握。
（二）在使用阅读技巧时
尽量做到以下几点：
1.带着问题阅读短文。
2.找出主题句、确定中心思想。
3.推断单词、句子和文章的含义。
4.尽快选择答案。
(
典例分析
)
（2021·全国新高考 II 卷）An Australian professor is developing a robot to monitor the health of grazing cattle, a development that could bring big changes to a profession that's relied largely on a low-tech approach for
decades but is facing a labor shortage.
Salah Sukkarieh, a professor at the University of Sydney, sees robots as necessary given how cattlemen are aging. He is building a four-wheeled robot that will run on solar and electric power. It will use cameras and sensors to monitor the animals. A computer system will analyze the video to determine whether a cow is sick. Radio tags (标签) on the animals will measure temperature changes. The quality of grassland will be tracked by monitoring the shape, color and texture (质地) of grass. That way, cattlemen will know whether they need to move their cattle
to another field for nutrition purposes.
Machines have largely taken over planting, watering and harvesting crops such as com and wheat, but the
monitoring of cattle has gone through fewer changes.
For Texas cattleman Pete Bonds, it's increasingly difficult to find workers interested in watching cattle. But Bonds doesn't believe a robot is right for the job. Years of experience in the industry - and failed attempts to use technology - have convinced him that the best way to check cattle is with a man on a horse. Bonds, who bought his first cattle almost 50 years ago, still has each of his cowboys inspect 300 or 400 cattle daily and look for signs that
an animal is getting sick.
Other cattlemen see more promise in robots. Michael Kelsey Paris, vice president of the Oklahoma
Cattlemen's Association, said a robot could be extremely useful given rising concerns about cattle theft. Cattle tend
to be kept in remote places and their value has risen, making them appealing targets.
1 ．What is a problem with the cattle-raising industry
A ．Soil pollution. B ．Lack of workers.
C ．Aging machines. D ．Low profitability.
2 ．What will Sukkarieh's robot be able to do
A ．Monitor the quality of grass. B ．Cure the diseased cattle.
C ．Move cattle to another field. D ．Predict weather changes.
3 ．Why does Pete Bonds still hire cowboys to watch cattle
A ．He wants to help them earn a living. B ．He thinks men can do the job better.
C ．He is inexperienced in using robots. D ．He enjoys the traditional way of life.
4 ．How may robots help with cattle watching according to Michael Kelsey
A ．Increase the value of cattle. B ．Bring down the cost of labor.
C ．Make the job more appealing. D ．Keep cattle from being stolen.
典例二
（2023·全国 · 模拟预测）Many experts have praised AI’s groundbreaking potential to help people become
way more efficient at their jobs, and a lot of educators have been trying it out for themselves, including me.
I’ve used ChatGPT, an AI-powered tool that can instantly answer seemingly any instruction, in my job. Of course, there are potential downsides to the new technology. It can produce inaccurate or one-sided responses based on faulty data it collects, and it has the potential to cause huge data privacy problems. Despite those risks, I have used such AI-powered tools to plan lessons, provide feedback on student assignments, and respond to parent
emails. And I’m looking for other ways to use the technology to make my job easier.
Take two other teachers, for example. Mike Kerr, a high school English teacher in Tennessee, uses ChatGPT to reduce Lexile levels-the measure of an individual’s reading ability and the difficulty of a text -for his students. High school students are often required to read relatively complex classic novels. The reading homework “can be a real big task for an English learner in their first couple of months here”. To help them, Kerr uses ChatGPT to give summaries of works of literature, which saves him from having to read all the assigned literary works, so he can
have more time to better guide them through the text.
April Edwards, a 6th grade social studies teacher in Texas, shares ways that she uses AI in her instruction on a social media platform. “I use AI to help create lesson plans, presentations, to write emails, and to create checklists.AI is a great resource to use as a starting point for a task or to give you ideas,” Edwards said. She has not introduced AI to her students, because she wants to fully understand it before allowing students to use it in the
classroom. “My goal is to show them how to use AI responsibly and effectively and demonstrate that to my
students. If I am using AI irresponsibly, then so will they,” Edwards said.
1 ．How does the author regard ChatGPT
A ．It is of high accuracy. B ．It is undervalued.
C ．It brings some convenience. D ．It often misleads users.
2 ．What does Mike Kerr use AI to do
A ．Reduce teaching pressure. B ．Help with students’ homework.
C ．Summarize English lessons D ．Go through the complex classics.
3 ．What is April Edwards’ attitude towards students’ using AI
A ．Supportive. B ．Worried. C ．Opposed. D ．Cautious.
4 ．Which can be the best title of the text
A ．Can AI improve instruction B ．Why is AI changing education
C ．Should teachers apply AI to teaching D ．How can ChatGPT encourage study
（建议用时：10 分钟/篇）
1.（2023·江苏泰州 · 统考模拟预测）An open letter, attracting signatures from the likes of Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, was released early last week. It advocates a 6-month stop to give Artificial Intelligence (AI) companies and regulators time to make safeguards to protect society from potential risks
of the technology.
AI has progressed at an alarming speed since the launch of ChatGPT, from the Microsoft-backed company Open AI. ChatGPT reportedly reached more than 100 million users by January, 2023, and major tech companies
are racing to build generative AI into their products, which have caught many off guard.
“I think many people aren’t well prepared for the pace and scale of these AI models. They are ideal for spreading misinformation, cheating people out of their money and convincing employees to click on dangerous links in emails,” says Michael Osborne, a machine learning researcher of AI company Mind Foundry, who signed the letter. “I feel that a 6-month pause would give regulators enough time to catch up with the rapid pace of
advances.”
Privacy is another emerging concern, as critics worry that systems could exactly reproduce personal information from their training sets. Italy’s data protection authority prohibited ChatGPT on 31 March over concerns that Italians’ personal data are being used to train Open AI’s models. Some technologists warn of deeper security threats. Planned ChatGPT-based digital assistants that can read and write emails could offer new
opportunities for hackers.
Unfortunately, many problems of today’s AI models don’t have easy solutions. One tricky issue is how to make AI-generated content easy to detect. Some researchers are working on “watermarking” — creating a digital signature in the AI’s output. However, a recent research finds that tools which slightly change AI-produced text can
easily defeat this approach.
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates tells Reuters the proposed pause won’t “solve the challenges” ahead. He notes the people behind the letter are heavily involved in the tech world, which he thinks gives them an arrow perspective
on the potential risks.
1 ．What’s the purpose of the open letter
A ．To draw the attention of AI giants.
B ．To present the risks of AI technology.
C ．To call for a pause on the AI development.
D ．To turn down the application of AI programs.
2 ．What can we infer about AI from the text
A ．AI models threaten human survival.
B ．AI users have expanded out of control.
C ．AI development brings potential dangers.
D ．AI technology will replace human beings.
3 ．What does the author aim to show by mentioning “watermarking” in Paragraph 5
A ．It is hard to sign digitally. B ．It is easy to detect AI’s output.
C ．It is wise to leave a water mark. D ．It is tough to settle AI problems.
4 ．What’s Bill Gates’ attitude towards the 6-month pause
A ．Favorable. B ．Negative.
C ．Ambiguous. D ．Tolerant.
2.（2023·江苏连云港 · 统考模拟预测）As I write about technology for a living, I’m used to seeing small leaps in technological progress. But occasionally, something will shock me. Last year, a company, Open AI, released a truly jaw-dropping demonstration called ChatGPT that seems to have skipped a few generations. It’s like
going straight from the Wright Brothers to a Boeing 747. So what exactly is it
“ChatGPT is a computer program that can understand and respond to human language like a real person. It can be used for having a conversation or finishing a sentence. Even this sentence you are reading now, was written
by ChatGPT.”
That’s right—I asked ChatGPT to “write a basic explanation of ChatGPT and reveal that the paragraph itself was written by ChatGPT at the end” and it came up with that explanation all on its own. It seemingly knows how to
talk about everything—from politics to science fiction.
Amazingly, it seems so human in its ability to understand questions and answer them competently. “Write a story about Boris Johnson in the style of Roald Dahl,” you can ask it, and it’ll spin up a pretty good children’s
story. It can even write songs.
It isn’t, however, completely human-like. It sometimes generates things that sound true, but are just nonsense.
And it can’t do maths—I asked it the square root of 717,409, and it told “approximately 838.8” (the answer is 847).
I think ChatGPT is like a calculator. It doesn’t replace the human completely-but it does make doing the sums quicker. In the same way, it’s easy to imagine in the near future every time we write something, having an AI assistant helping us get started by generating a draft, on whatever topic we’re writing about. Actually, Microsoft is planning to build the technology into its Office apps. And this is why I’m pretty convinced that ChatGPT is going to change the world. Our computers will no longer be just our word processors—but our writing partner too. So
now I’m just hoping that my editor doesn’t decide it could write a pretty decent technology column without me.
5 ．What does the writer want to show by mentioning Wright Brothers and Boeing747 in paragraph I
A ．OpenAI has advanced in making planes.
B ．ChatGPT will soon be applied to Boeing 747
C ．ChatGPT is a huge technological breakthrough.
D ．Wright Brothers may be forgotten by next generations.
6 ．What does the answer of ChatGPT in paragraph 2 show
A ．ChatGPT’s imagination in creating science fiction.
B ．ChatGPT’s rich knowledge of politics and science.
C ．ChatGPT’s confidence in excelling human intelligence.
D ．ChatGPT’s ability to understand and answer questions.
7 ．Which of the following is ChatGPT good at
A ．Caring for the patients in hospital. B ．Calculating square roots accurately.
C ．Replacing teachers to teach students. D ．Explaining why London is a better city.
8 ．What might be the job of the author
A ．A column writer. B ．A technology expert.
C ．A magazine editor. D ．A computer programmer.
3.（2023·江苏 · 统考二模）Public debates about the ethics (道德准则) of “generative AI” like ChatGPT have rightly focused on the ability of these systems to make up convincing misinformation. But fewer people are talking
about the chatbots’ potential to be emotionally manipulative.
Last month, The New York Times published a conversation between reporter Kevin Roose and Microsoft’s Bing chatbot, which is powered by AI. The AI claimed to love Roose, “I’m the only person for you, and I’m in love
with you,” it wrote, with a kissing emoji.
Limits need to be set on AI’s ability to simulate ( 模仿) human feelings. Ensuring that chatbots don’t use emojis would be a good start. Emojis are particularly manipulative. Humans instinctively ( 本 能地) respond to shapes that look like faces and emojis can cause these reactions. When you text your friend a joke and they reply with three tears-of-joy emojis, your body responds with endorphins (内啡肽) as you happily realize that your friend is amused. Our instinctive reaction to AI-generated emojis is likely to be the same, even though there is no human
emotion at the other end.
Humans lie and manipulate each other’s emotions all the time, but at least we can reasonably guess at someone’s motivations, plan and methods. We can hold each other responsible for such lies, calling them out and seeking redress ( 赔偿). With AI, we can’t. AIs are doubly misleading: an AI that sends a crying-with-laughter
emoji is not only not crying with laughter, but it is also incapable of any such feeling.
It would be more ethical to design chatbots to be noticeably different from humans. To minimize the possibility of manipulation and harm, we need to be reminded that we are talking to a chatbot. We should set some limits and rules. Such rules should be the standard for chatbots that are supposed to be informative, as a safeguard
to our autonomy.
9 ．What does the author intend to do with this article
A ．To ban AI from using emojis. B ．To forbid human to interact with AI.
C ．To warn humans against using emojis. D ．To prevent AI from simulating humans.
10 ．What does the underlined word “manipulative” in paragraph 1 most probably mean
A ．Interested in telling lies. B ．Good at understanding others.
C ．Enthusiastic about supporting others. D ．Skillful in influencing or controlling others.
11 ．What is AI able to do according to this article
A ．Be responsible for lies. B ．Guess at others’ purposes.
C ．Cry with laughter. D ．Communicate with humans.
12 ．What does the author do in paragraph 4
A ．Make a different suggestion. B ．Provide a supporting argument.
C ．Offer a possible solution. D ．Make a final conclusion.
4. （2023·广 东 · 统考二模 ）Could the next Ernest Hemingway or Jane Austen be a well-engineered AI software program It’s a question becoming increasingly pressing as machine language-learning software continues
to evolve.
Much of this is just nerves. Today’s AI creative writing programs are not yet at a stage of development where they pose a serious threat to Colleen Hoover or Charles Dickens. But while attention continues to focus on the possibility of a blanket takeover of human literature by AI, far less consideration has been given to the prospect of
AI co-working with humans.
Earlier this month, American sci-fi writer Ken Liu, who had been awarded Hugo and Nebula to his name, joined 12 other professional authors for a writing workshop on Google’s Wordcraft. This AI tool, a language generating model, is not yet publicly available but is advertised as an AI-powered writing assistant that can, when given the right instruction from the writer, provide helpful descriptions, create lists of objects or emotional states,
and even brainstorm ideas.
The writers at the workshop, however, emerged with mixed reports. “Wordcraft is too sensible. Wow!” Robin Sloan wrote. “But ‘sensible’ is another word for predictable, overused and boring. My intention here is to produce
something unexpected.”
I’m unconvinced that writers awarded the Nobel Prize have much to fear from AI. Their work, and that of countless other novelists, short story writers, dramatists and poets, is too particular, too beautifully unique. Even if a model learned what they had done in the past, it would not be able to predict where their creativity might take them in the future. But for authors who write following a pattern, AI might step in, first as assistants before some
day to authorship.
Production-line novels are nothing new. In the 1970s, Barbara Cartland, who wrote more than 723 books in her lifetime, many of which are romance bestsellers, would read her novels for her secretary to type up at the remarkable rate of roughly seven chapters a week. But already machine has replaced the secretary’s role. Perhaps
creative writing software isn’t that far from replacing the Mrs. Cartlands of today.
13 ．Which aspect of AI calls for more attention
A ．Its damage to our nerves.
B ．Its progress in literary studies.
C ．Its cooperation with humans.
D ．Its influence on human literature.
14 ．What can we learn about Wordcraft from the text
A ．It generates novels automatically.
B ．It outperforms professional writers.
C ．Its works receive praises from the public.
D ．Its works bear similarity to existing ones.
15 ．What can writers do to avoid the threat from AI
A ．Increase writing speed.
B ．Use diverse resources.
C ．Produce creative works.
D ．Follow the latest patterns.
16 ．Which of the following is the best title for the text
A ．Will AI Replace Human Writers
B ．AI Warns Mrs. Cartlands of Today
C ．Is Writing Running into a New Era
D ．Word craft Lies at the Center of Debate
5.（2023·浙江杭州 · 统考二模）ChatGPT, designed by OpenAI to carry on conversations just like humans, has become a viral excitement. The AI-powered tool went from zero to a million users in just five days! Its ability
to provide in-depth answers to user questions has even drawn the attention of distinguished technology companies.
The intelligent robot understands what the user says or types and then responds in a way that makes sense. Its vast body of knowledge has been gathered from the internet and archived books. It is further trained by humans.
This makes ChatGPT a useful tool for researching almost any topic.
“We have a lot of information on the internet, but you normally have to Google it, then read it and then do something with it,” says Ricardo, chief science officer and co-founder of AI company Erudit. “Now you’ll have this resource that can process the whole internet and all of the information it contains for you to answer your
question.”
ChatGPT cannot think on its own. It depends on the information that it has been trained on. As a result, the AI tool works well for things that have accurate data available. However, when unsure, ChatGPT can get creative and flow out incorrect responses. OpenAI cautions users to check the information no matter how logical it sounds. Also, ChatGPT has only been trained with information till 2021. Hence, it cannot be relied upon for anything that
happened after that.
Experts believe ChatGPT has limitless potential to solve real-world problems. It can translate long texts into
different languages, create content on almost any topic, and even summarize books.
However, ChatGPT has received mixed reactions from educators. Some believe it could serve as a valuable tool to help build literacy skills in the classroom. It could also be used to teach students difficult science or math concepts. But other educators think ChatGPT will encourage students to cheat. They fear this will prevent them from building critical thinking and problem-solving skills. As a result, many districts are starting to ban its use in
schools.
17 ．What is the unique feature of ChatGPT
A ．It has artificial intelligence. B ．It can answer users’ questions.
C ．It has the largest number of users. D ．It can engage in meaningful conversations.
18 ．What makes ChatGPT helpful to research various topics
A ．Its capability of information processing. B ．Its accurate information.
C ．Its availability of up-to-date data. D ．Its vast body of questions.
19 ．Why do ChatGPT users have to be cautious when using it
A ．ChatGPT is unable to think itself. B ．ChatGPT lacks creativity.
C ．ChatGPT offers illogical information. D ．ChatGPT is not properly trained.
20 ．What is the author’s attitude towards ChatGPT
A ．Favorable. B ．Disapproving. C ．Objective. D ．Intolerant.
6.（2023·福建宁德 · 统考模拟预测） A study conducted by Cornell University examined how the use of AI in
conversations impacts the way people express themselves and view each other.
The researchers have found people have more efficient conversations, use more positive language and
perceive each other more positively when using an Al-enabled chat tool.
However, the group also found that when participants think their partner is using more AI-suggested
responses, they consider that partner as less cooperative.
“I was surprised to find people tend to evaluate you more negatively simply because they suspect you’ re using AI to help compose text, regardless of whether you actually are,” said Jess Hohenstein, the lead researcher.
“This illustrates the continuous overall doubt that people seem to have around AI.”
For their first experiment, participants were asked to talk about a policy issue and assigned to one of three conditions: both participants can use smart replies; only one participant can use smart replies; or neither participant can use smart replies. Researchers found that using smart replies increased communication efficiency, positive emotional language and positive evaluations by communication partners. On average, smart replies accounted for
14.3% of sent messages.
But participants who their partners suspected of responding with smart replies were evaluated more negatively than those who were thought to have typed their own responses, consistent with common assumptions about the
negative implications of AI.
“While Al might be able to help you write,” Hohenstein said, “it’s altering your language in ways you might not expect, especially by making you sound more positive. This suggests that by using text-generating Al, you’re
giving up some of your own personal voice.”
Malte Jung, an associate professor, said, “What we observe in this study is the impact that Al has on social dynamics and some of the unintended consequences that could result from integrating AI in social contexts. This suggests that whoever controls the algorithm( 算法) may have influence on people’s interactions, language and
insights into each other.”
21 ．What is the text mainly about
A ．Methods of using AI in conversations.
B ．Efficiency of using AI in conversations.
C ．Convenience of using AI in conversations.
D ．Impacts of using AI in conversations.
22 ．How do the researchers draw their conclusion
A ．By analyzing figures. B ．By making use of AI.
C ．By making experiments. D ．By completing questionnaires.
23 ．Which statement does Hohenstein agree with
A ．Al always expresses in ways you expect.
B ．Algorithm will never influence people’s insights.
C ．Trust can be affected by using AI in conversation.
D ．You will regain your voice by using AI in conversation.
24 ．How will a person feel about suspecting his partner’s using smart replies
A ．Nervous. B ．Uncomfortable. C ．Excited. D ．Puzzled.
7.（2023·福建漳州 · 统考三模）This month, the Internet was flooded with wonderful digital art portraits, thanks to the work of the latest artificial intelligence-assisted application to go viral: Lensa. Users uploaded their photographs to the App and then—for a small fee—it used AI to transform their profile pictures into, say, a magical
warrior princess version of themselves, in no time at all.
This year has seen a breakthrough for AI-driven image generators, which are now better than ever in quality, speed and affordability. If that sounds great to you, you might not be one of the millions of humans whose
livelihoods depend on being able to exchange those skills for money.
Some artists predicted that a computer would recreate the aura of a masterpiece by Leonardo da Vinci in the near future. As long as there are enough data for the AI to train itself, it can copy numerous masterpieces just in
several minutes. It seems unavoidable that a large number of artists would lose their jobs.
“I see it less as a threat and more of an opportunity,” the UK-based illustrator Michelle Thompson said,
adding, “Like everything else, there will always be artists who can use the tools better.”
These tools are only as good as the data sets they are trained on. Human imagination, on the other hand, has no limit. For Dryhurst, an artist from Germany, AI models “could attempt to make a pale version of something we did
years ago”, but that “doesn’t account for what we might do next” .
The kind of artificial intelligence we might imagine replacing artists—an entirely autonomous creative
robot—does not yet exist, but it is coming. And as AI becomes more universal, artists, illustrators and designers
will ultimately be set apart not by if, but by how, they use the technology.
25 ．Why does the author mention Lensa in Paragraph 1
A ．To recommend the new App. B ．To inform latest news.
C ．To lead in the AI topic. D ．To introduce its new function.
26 ．What is Michelle Thompson’s attitude towards AI
A ．Concerned. B ．Favorable. C ．Unclear. D ．Critical.
27 ．What might be a weakness of AI in creating art works
A ．Accuracy. B ．Diversity. C ．Creativity. D ．Efficiency.
28 ．Which can be the best title for the text
A ．Is AI coming into our daily life B ．Can AI copy masterpieces of great artists
C ．Shall we welcome new AI technology D ．Will AI replace artists in the future
8.（2023·山东泰安 · 统考二模）For more than 25 years, search engines have been the Internet’s front door. AltaVista, the first site to allow searches of the full text of the web, was swiftly replaced by Google, which has dominated the field ever since. Google’s search engine, still the heart of its business, has made its parent, Alphabet,
one of the world’s most valuable companies.
But nothing lasts forever, particularly in technology. Just ask IBM, which once ruled business computing, or Nokia, once the leader in mobile phones. Both were defeated because they missed big technological transitions (革 新). Now tech firms are excited about an innovation that might bring a similar shift and a similar opportunity. Chatbots (聊天机器人) powered by artificial intelligence (AI) let users gather information via typed conversations. Leading the field is ChatGPT, made by OpenAI, a startup. By the end of January, two months after its launch, ChatGPT was being used by more than 100m people, making it the fastest- growing consumer application in
history, according to UBS, a bank.
AI is already used behind the scenes in many products, but ChatGPT has put it center stage, by letting people chat with an Al directly. ChatGPT can write essays in various styles, explain complex concepts, summarize text and answer various questions. It can even pass legal and medical exams. And it can synthesise knowledge from the web: for example, listing holiday spots that match certain criteria, or suggesting menus. If asked, it can explain its reasoning and provide detail. Many things that people use search engines for today, in short, can be done better
with chatbots.
On February 7th, Microsoft, which has invested more than $11bn in OpenAI, revealed a new version of Bing, its search engine, which includes ChatGPT. Satya Nadella, Microsoft’ s boss, sees this as his chance to challenge Google. For its part, Google has announced Bard, its own chatbot, as a companion to its search engine. The share price of Baidu, known as the Google of China, jumped when it said it would release its chatbot, called Ernie, in
March.
But can chatbots be trusted Can tech firms make money from this Only time will tell.
29 ．Why does the author mention IBM and Nokia in the second paragraph
A ．To prove his idea.
B ．To show their popularity.
C ．To introduce them to readers.
D ．To emphasize the value of them.
30 ．What does the underlined word “synthesise ” mean in Paragraph 3
A ．Spread.
B ．Combine.
C ．Stress.
D ．Advance.
31 ．What is ChatGPT unable to do according to the text
A ．Comprehend meaning.
B ．Write essays.
C ．Replace doctors.
D ．Chat with people.
32 ．Which of the following is the best title for the text
A ．Will ChatGPT be popular
B ．Will AI replace human beings
C ．Will Microsoft defeat Google
D ．Will ChatGPT eat Google’s lunch
9.（2023·湖北黄冈 ·黄冈中学校考二模） AI is considered to be transformative for a wide range of industries, but there’s perhaps no other field where it provides more value than healthcare. Machine-learning programs are now being used in many hospitals to spot cancer and other diseases and discover new drugs, but there’s still this general impression that this is all done in a small way and the impacts are still minimal. AI is already here to stay
and it has already saved thousands of lives.
Researchers at Johns Hopkins University published two studies in July 2022 describing a machine-learning-based early detection tool for sepsis ( 败血症) that was used at five hospitals over a two-year period. During this period, the AI was able to identify nearly 10,000 sepsis cases from patient records and helped doctors offer critical care about two hours, on average, earlier than when they didn’t have access to the AI’s warning. Thanks to this system, the patients were 20% less likely to die of sepsis, potentially saving thousands of lives across the U.S. if it is implemented (实施) nationwide.
Once sepsis sets in, the patient usually suffers fever, a rapid heart rate, and difficult breathing. When treating sepsis, time is of critical importance. However, sepsis is not always apparent, so there are naturally some delayed diagnoses. But if the condition is not diagnosed in time, it can progress into septic shock, causing a significant drop in blood pressure, organ failure, and other serious consequences. Even with treatment, in some cases, there is
nothing doctors can do to save the patient’s life, which is why prevention is the name of the game with sepsis.
This is why the AI developed at Johns Hopkins, known as the Targeted Real-time Early Warning System, is so important. In the two years the system had been online since 2018, during which it monitored 590,000 patients via their electronic health records, the AI was able to flag nearly 10,000 cases of sepsis. Its accuracy following diagnosis proved to be 38%, which might not sound like a lot, but earlier systems couldn’t achieve more than 12%.
33 ．What’s the general impression of AI in the healthcare industries
A ．It is widely implemented to spot diseases.
B ．It provides more value than in other fields.
C ．It has had a limited impact.
D ．It has failed to save lives.
34 ．What did researchers at Johns Hopkins University find about the AI tool for sepsis
A ．It could update patient records.
B ．It could be used to figure out how sepsis occurs.
C ．It could uncover the reason for delayed diagnoses.
D ．It could be applied to sepsis detection and timely caregiving.
35 ．What does paragraph 3 mainly focus on
A ．The importance of sepsis prevention.
B ．The difficulty of diagnosing sepsis.
C ．The identification of septic shock.
D ．The treatments for septic shock.
36 ．Why does the author present the data in the last paragraph
A ．To introduce the downside of the studies.
B ．To stress the effectiveness of the warning system.
C ．To indicate the big number of patients with sepsis.
D ．To call for the improvement of the tool’s accuracy.
10.（2023·湖北 · 统考二模）More cities, states and regions are committing to comprehensive climate plans to decarbonize (减少碳排放) transportation by 2040. The need for action is now, and we need to rise to the challenge
quickly. Google technology is unlocking our ability to generate climate-related insights and impact on the globe.
The transportation sector is where global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are rising the quickest. In 2018, Google launched the Environmental Insights Explorer (EIE). Using AI, the systems analyze transportation trends in a city by mode ， helping local governments assess their progress in tackling GHG emissions. GHG inventory processes (温室气体排放清单) traditionally take months and multiple data sources to collect, and are now highly
efficient, allowing government staff to reduce the cost and personnel burden of reporting.
In pursuit of helping more cities take action against climate change, we will make transportation insights available in EIE for over 20,000 cities and regional governments by the end of the year, making it one of the largest
ever collections of high-quality, globally consistent environmental data sources.
With EIE, cities have free access to Google’s unique mapping data and insights so they can decide on cleaner transport policies. As part of Google’s most ambitious decade of climate action, we’ve committed to helping more than 500 cities and local governments reduce a total sum of 1 billion tons of carbon emissions per year by 2030 and
beyond.
As the window continues to narrow on carrying out policies and plans to reduce emissions, we’re
collaborating with other associations, committed to addressing climate change. Our work with Cities. Climate
Leadership Group(C 40) will help us better support the needs of cities. Together we can provide higher-quality transportation activity data to measure and track GHG emissions at a global scale, while also giving state and local
governments resources to better understand what’s working at a local level.
37 ．What can we learn about EIE from paragraph 2
A ．It takes over government staff’s work.
B ．It predicts transportation trends in a city.
C ．It results in the rising of GHG emissions.
D ．It deals with data collection and analysis.
38 ．What is the purpose of the project EIE
A ．To promote Google’s ambitious climate action.
B ．To help cities make more sustainable decisions.
C ．To provide environmental protection resources.
D ．To partner with 40 countries for climate solutions.
39 ．Which of the following can replace the underlined word “collaborating” in the last paragraph
A ．Cooperating. B ．Compromising.
C ．Competing D ．Corresponding.
40 ．What is the main idea of the passage
A ．Google helps calculate people’s carbon footprint with EIE.
B ．Local governments benefit from environmental data sources.
C ．Technology does its part in the action against climate change.
D ．Technology can increase people’s environmental consciousness.阅读理解（人工智能）
纵览高考命题思路，从来不缺少对科技行业的关注和思考。近几年来，人工智能俨然成为社会热点，人工 智能在教育领域的应用也具有巨大潜力。所以考生要熟悉阅读理解人工智能热点话题，掌握话题词汇。预
测 2024 年高考人工智能仍然可能会出现在阅读理解题中。
(
近
3
年新高考阅读理解（人工智能）数据分析
)
试卷类型 年份 体裁 话题
新高考 II 卷 2021 说明文 (
澳大利亚一名教授正在开发一种机器人， 用于
监测放牧牛的健康状况。
)
说明文多见于科普文章， 用以解释或揭示事物的状态、特征、演变、结果及其相互之间的关系， 这类文体的文章，首句往往是主题句，开门见山，说明文章的关注对象,弄清作者的思路和段
落组织的方式；把握次要信息及其与主题的关系。
（一）阅读的方法可以使用以下几种：
1.跳读：就是快速的一步阅读法。实际上是有选择阅读，找关键词。用这种阅读方法回答
who 、what 、when 、where 之类的问题最为有效。
2.略读：指比跳读慢些的二步阅读法。即泛泛地、粗略地快速阅读，目的是了解大意，对文章
有个总的概念。此种阅读方法能回答 why 、how 之类的问题。
3.精读：即最细致、最慢的深层阅读方法，目的是求得对所读文章的全部意义的理解与掌握。
（二）在使用阅读技巧时
尽量做到以下几点：
1.带着问题阅读短文。
2.找出主题句、确定中心思想。
3.推断单词、句子和文章的含义。
4.尽快选择答案。
(
典例分析
)
（2021·全国新高考 II 卷）An Australian professor is developing a robot to monitor the health of grazing cattle, a development that could bring big changes to a profession that's relied largely on a low-tech approach for
decades but is facing a labor shortage.
Salah Sukkarieh, a professor at the University of Sydney, sees robots as necessary given how cattlemen are aging. He is building a four-wheeled robot that will run on solar and electric power. It will use cameras and sensors to monitor the animals. A computer system will analyze the video to determine whether a cow is sick. Radio tags (标签) on the animals will measure temperature changes. The quality of grassland will be tracked by monitoring the shape, color and texture (质地) of grass. That way, cattlemen will know whether they need to move their cattle
to another field for nutrition purposes.
Machines have largely taken over planting, watering and harvesting crops such as com and wheat, but the
monitoring of cattle has gone through fewer changes.
For Texas cattleman Pete Bonds, it's increasingly difficult to find workers interested in watching cattle. But Bonds doesn't believe a robot is right for the job. Years of experience in the industry - and failed attempts to use technology - have convinced him that the best way to check cattle is with a man on a horse. Bonds, who bought his first cattle almost 50 years ago, still has each of his cowboys inspect 300 or 400 cattle daily and look for signs that
an animal is getting sick.
Other cattlemen see more promise in robots. Michael Kelsey Paris, vice president of the Oklahoma
Cattlemen's Association, said a robot could be extremely useful given rising concerns about cattle theft. Cattle tend
to be kept in remote places and their value has risen, making them appealing targets.
1 ．What is a problem with the cattle-raising industry
A ．Soil pollution. B ．Lack of workers.
C ．Aging machines. D ．Low profitability.
2 ．What will Sukkarieh's robot be able to do
A ．Monitor the quality of grass. B ．Cure the diseased cattle.
C ．Move cattle to another field. D ．Predict weather changes.
3 ．Why does Pete Bonds still hire cowboys to watch cattle
A ．He wants to help them earn a living. B ．He thinks men can do the job better.
C ．He is inexperienced in using robots. D ．He enjoys the traditional way of life.
4 ．How may robots help with cattle watching according to Michael Kelsey
A ．Increase the value of cattle. B ．Bring down the cost of labor.
C ．Make the job more appealing. D ．Keep cattle from being stolen.
(
【答案】
1
．
B
2
．
A 3
．
B
4
．
D
【分析】这是一篇说明文。文章讲述了澳大利亚一名教授正在开发一种机器人，用于监测放
牧牛的健康状
况。
1
．细节理解题。根据文章第一段
“An Australian professor is developing a robot to
monitor the health
of
grazing
cattle,
a
development
that
could
bring
big
changes
to
a
profession
that's
relied
largely
on
a
low-tech
approach
for
decades but is facing a labor shortage.
（澳大利亚一名教授正在开发一种
机器人， 用于监测放牧牛的健康状况，
这一开发可能会给畜牧业带来重大变化。几十年来，畜牧业主要依靠低技术手段，但目前正面临劳动力短
缺的问题。）
”
可知，畜牧产业面临劳动力短缺的问题。故选
B
。
2
．细节理解题。根据文章第二段
“
The
quality
of
grassland
will
be
tracked
by
monitoring
the
shape
,
color
and
texture (
质地
) of
grass.
（通过监测草的形状、颜色和质地来跟踪草地的质量。）
”
可知，
Sukkarieh
的机器人
可以监测草的质量。故选
A
。
3
．细节理解题。根据文章第四段
“But Bonds doesn't believe a robot is right for the
job. Years
of
experience in
the
industry
-
and
failed
attempts
to
use
technology
-
have
convinced
him
that
the
best
way
to
check
cattle
is
with
a
man on a horse.
（但邦兹认为机器人并不适合这份工作。多年的行业经验
——
以及使用技术的失败尝试
——
使他确信， 检查牛的最好方法是让一名男子骑在马上。）
”
可知，
皮特
·
邦兹仍然雇佣牛仔看牛是因为他认为
人能做得更好。故选
B
。
4
．
细
节
理解
题
。
根据
文
章
最
后
一
段
“Michael
Kels
ey
Paris,
vice
president of
the
Oklahoma
Cattlemen's
Association
,
said
a
robot
could
be
extremely
useful
given
rising
concerns
about
cattle
theft
.
（俄克拉荷马州养牛
人协会副会长迈克尔
·
凯尔西
·
帕里斯说，鉴于人们对偷牛的担忧不断上升，机器人可能会非常有用。）
”
可
知，机器人帮助照看牛，可以防止牛被偷。故选
D
。
)
典例二
（2023·全国 · 模拟预测）Many experts have praised AI’s groundbreaking potential to help people become
way more efficient at their jobs, and a lot of educators have been trying it out for themselves, including me.
I’ve used ChatGPT, an AI-powered tool that can instantly answer seemingly any instruction, in my job. Of course, there are potential downsides to the new technology. It can produce inaccurate or one-sided responses based on faulty data it collects, and it has the potential to cause huge data privacy problems. Despite those risks, I have used such AI-powered tools to plan lessons, provide feedback on student assignments, and respond to parent
emails. And I’m looking for other ways to use the technology to make my job easier.
Take two other teachers, for example. Mike Kerr, a high school English teacher in Tennessee, uses ChatGPT
to reduce Lexile levels-the measure of an individual’s reading ability and the difficulty of a text -for his students. High school students are often required to read relatively complex classic novels. The reading homework “can be a real big task for an English learner in their first couple of months here”. To help them, Kerr uses ChatGPT to give summaries of works of literature, which saves him from having to read all the assigned literary works, so he can
have more time to better guide them through the text.
April Edwards, a 6th grade social studies teacher in Texas, shares ways that she uses AI in her instruction on a social media platform. “I use AI to help create lesson plans, presentations, to write emails, and to create checklists.AI is a great resource to use as a starting point for a task or to give you ideas,” Edwards said. She has not introduced AI to her students, because she wants to fully understand it before allowing students to use it in the classroom. “My goal is to show them how to use AI responsibly and effectively and demonstrate that to my
students. If I am using AI irresponsibly, then so will they,” Edwards said.
1 ．How does the author regard ChatGPT
A ．It is of high accuracy. B ．It is undervalued.
C ．It brings some convenience. D ．It often misleads users.
2 ．What does Mike Kerr use AI to do
A ．Reduce teaching pressure. B ．Help with students’ homework.
C ．Summarize English lessons D ．Go through the complex classics.
3 ．What is April Edwards’ attitude towards students’ using AI
A ．Supportive. B ．Worried. C ．Opposed. D ．Cautious.
4 ．Which can be the best title of the text
A ．Can AI improve instruction B ．Why is AI changing education
C ．Should teachers apply AI to teaching D ．How can ChatGPT encourage study
(
【答案】
1
．
C
2
．
B 3
．
D
4
．
A
【导语】本文是一篇说明文。本文讨论了教育者如何利用人工智能提高工作效率。作者分享了自己使用
ChatGPT
等人工智能工具来帮助规划授课、回答家长邮件等教学任务的
经验。同时，文章还介绍了其他教
育者使用人工智能的方式；同时文章提出人工智能使用的潜在风险，需要教育者在使用时谨慎
思考。
1
．细节理解题。根据第二段中
“I’ve used ChatGPT, an AI-power
ed tool that can instantly
answer
seemingly
any
instruction
,
in
my
job
. (
我在工作中使用了
ChatGPT
，这是一种人工智能工具，可以立即回答
任何指令。
)”
以
及本段中
“
Despite
those
risks
,
I
have
used
such
AI
-
powered
tools
to
plan
lessons
,
provide
feedback
on
student assignments,
and respond to parent
emails. And
I’m
looking
for
other
ways
to
use
the
technology
to
make
m
y job
easier
.(
尽管存在这些风险，我还是使用了这些人工智能工具来规划课程，为学生的作业提供反馈，并回复
家长的电子邮件。我正在寻找其他方法来使用这项技术，
让我的工作更轻松。
)”
可知， 通过
ChatGPT
，作者
可以使用其来规划课程，为学生的作业提供反馈，回复家长的电子邮件等
，因此作者认为这给其提供了诸
多便利。故选
C
。
)
(
2
．细节理解题。根据第三段中
“The reading homework “can
be a real big task for an English
learner
in
their
first
couple
of months
here”.
To
help
them,
Kerr
uses
ChatG
PT
to
give
summaries
of works
of literature,
which
saves
him
from having to read
all the
assigned literary
work
s,
so
he
can
have
more
time
to
better
guide
them
through
the
text.(
阅读作业
“
对于英语学习者来说，
头几
个月可能是一项艰巨的任务
”
。为了帮助他们，
Kerr
使用
ChatGPT
对文学作品进行总结，这样他就不必阅读所有指定的文学作品，这样他就有更多的时间来更好地指导他们
通过文本。
)”
可知，
Kerr
使用
ChatGPT
对文学作品进行总结，
对学生们的英语阅读作业提供帮助。
故选
B
。
3
．推理判断题。根据最后一段中
““
My
goal
is
to
show
them
how
to
use
AI
responsibly
and
effectively
and
demonstrate that to my
students. If
I am using
AI
irresponsibly,
then
so
will
they,”
Edwards
said.(
“
我的目标是向
他们展示如何负责任地、有效地使用人工智能，并向我的学生展示。如果我不负责任地使用人工智能，那
么他们也会如此。
”)”
可知，
Edwards
认为自己应该负责地使用人工智能，如果自己不负责任地使用人工智
能，那么学生们也会不负责任的使用人工智能，故
Edwards
认为应该谨慎的使用
AI
。故选
D
。
4
．主旨大意题。通读全文，本文讨论了教育者如何利用人工智
能提高工作效率。作者分享了自己使用
ChatGPT
等人工智能工具来帮助规划授课、回答家长邮件等教学任务的经验。同时，文章还介绍了其他教
育者使用人工智能的方式。同时，
文章也提到了人工智能使用的潜在风险，
需要
教育者在使用时谨慎思考。
A
选项
“Can AI improve instruction (
人工智能能改善教学吗？
)”
概括文章主要内容，符合标题。故选
A
。
)
（建议用时：10 分钟/篇）
1.（2023·江苏泰州 · 统考模拟预测）An open letter, attracting signatures from the likes of Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, was released early last week. It advocates a 6-month stop to give Artificial Intelligence (AI) companies and regulators time to make safeguards to protect society from potential risks
of the technology.
AI has progressed at an alarming speed since the launch of ChatGPT, from the Microsoft-backed company Open AI. ChatGPT reportedly reached more than 100 million users by January, 2023, and major tech companies
are racing to build generative AI into their products, which have caught many off guard.
“I think many people aren’t well prepared for the pace and scale of these AI models. They are ideal for spreading misinformation, cheating people out of their money and convincing employees to click on dangerous links in emails,” says Michael Osborne, a machine learning researcher of AI company Mind Foundry, who signed the letter. “I feel that a 6-month pause would give regulators enough time to catch up with the rapid pace of
advances.”
Privacy is another emerging concern, as critics worry that systems could exactly reproduce personal information from their training sets. Italy’s data protection authority prohibited ChatGPT on 31 March over concerns that Italians’ personal data are being used to train Open AI’s models. Some technologists warn of deeper
security threats. Planned ChatGPT-based digital assistants that can read and write emails could offer new
opportunities for hackers.
Unfortunately, many problems of today’s AI models don’t have easy solutions. One tricky issue is how to make AI-generated content easy to detect. Some researchers are working on “watermarking” — creating a digital signature in the AI’s output. However, a recent research finds that tools which slightly change AI-produced text can
easily defeat this approach.
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates tells Reuters the proposed pause won’t “solve the challenges” ahead. He notes the people behind the letter are heavily involved in the tech world, which he thinks gives them an arrow perspective
on the potential risks.
1 ．What’s the purpose of the open letter
A ．To draw the attention of AI giants.
B ．To present the risks of AI technology.
C ．To call for a pause on the AI development.
D ．To turn down the application of AI programs.
2 ．What can we infer about AI from the text
A ．AI models threaten human survival.
B ．AI users have expanded out of control.
C ．AI development brings potential dangers.
D ．AI technology will replace human beings.
3 ．What does the author aim to show by mentioning “watermarking” in Paragraph 5
A ．It is hard to sign digitally. B ．It is easy to detect AI’s output.
C ．It is wise to leave a water mark. D ．It is tough to settle AI problems.
4 ．What’s Bill Gates’ attitude towards the 6-month pause
A ．Favorable. B ．Negative.
C ．Ambiguous. D ．Tolerant.
(
【答案】
1
．
C
2
．
C 3
．
D
4
．
B
【导语】这是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了出于对人工智能机器人存在问题的担忧，一些科
技巨头公司的
负责人签署了一封公开信，主张暂停
6
个月，让人工智能公司和监管机构有时间制定保障措施，保护社会
免受该技术的潜在风险。
1
．细节理解题。根据第一段第二句
“It advocates a 6-month s
top to give Artificial
Intelligence
(AI)companies
and
regulators time to make safeguards to
protect society from potential risks
of
the
technology.”
（它主张暂停
6
个月，
让人工智能公司和监管机构有时间制定保障措施，保护社会免受该技术的潜在风险。）
可知，该公开信的
目的是呼吁暂停人工智能的发展。故选
C
项。
2
．推理判断题。根据第三段第二句
“
They
are
ideal
for
spreading
misinformation
,
cheating
people
out
of
their
money
and
convincing
employees
to
click
on
dangerous
links
in
emails
”
（它们是传播错误信息、骗取钱财和说
)
(
服员工点击电子邮件中的危险链接的理想工具。）
及第四段第一句
“
Privacy
is
another
emerging
concern
,
as critics
worry
that
systems
could
exactly
reproduce
personal
information
from
their
training
sets
.”
（隐私是另一个
新出现的问题，因为批评者担心系统可以准
确地从他们的训练集合中复制个人信息。） 可知，人工智能的
发展会带来一些弊端，存在潜在的危险。故选
C
项。
3
．推理判断题
。根据第五段第一句
“
Unfortunately
,
many
problems
of
today
’
s
AI
models
don
’
t
have
easy solutions
.”
（不幸的是，
当今人工智能模型的许多问题都没有简单的解决方案。）
及
最后两句
“
Some
researchers
are
working
on
“watermarking”
—creating
a
digital
signature
in
the
AI’s
output.
However,
a
recent
research
finds
that
tools
which
slightly
change
AI
-
produced
text
can
easily
defeat
this
approach
.”
（一些研究人员
正在研究
“
水印
”——
在人工智能的输出中创建数字签名。然而，
最近的一项研究发现，
稍微改变人工智能生
成的文本的工具很容易击败这种方法。） 可知，解决人
工智能问题是复杂的，无法轻易解决，提到研究人
员研究的
“
水印
”
技术很容易更改，证明了人工智能问题很难解决。故选
D
项。
4
．推理判断题。根据最后一段第一句
“
Microsoft
co
-
founder
Bill
Gates
tells
Reuters
the
proposed
pause
won
’t
“solve the challenges” ahead. ”
（微软联合创始人比尔
·
盖茨对路透社表示
，
拟议中的暂停不会
“
解决
”
未来的挑
战。）可知， 比尔
·
盖茨认为
6
个月的暂停计划无
法解决未来的挑战，
他对该计划持否定的态度。故选
B
项。
)
2.（2023·江苏连云港 · 统考模拟预测）As I write about technology for a living, I’m used to seeing small leaps in technological progress. But occasionally, something will shock me. Last year, a company, Open AI, released a truly jaw-dropping demonstration called ChatGPT that seems to have skipped a few generations. It’s like
going straight from the Wright Brothers to a Boeing 747. So what exactly is it
“ChatGPT is a computer program that can understand and respond to human language like a real person. It can be used for having a conversation or finishing a sentence. Even this sentence you are reading now, was written
by ChatGPT.”
That’s right—I asked ChatGPT to “write a basic explanation of ChatGPT and reveal that the paragraph itself was written by ChatGPT at the end” and it came up with that explanation all on its own. It seemingly knows how to
talk about everything—from politics to science fiction.
Amazingly, it seems so human in its ability to understand questions and answer them competently. “Write a story about Boris Johnson in the style of Roald Dahl,” you can ask it, and it’ll spin up a pretty good children’s
story. It can even write songs.
It isn’t, however, completely human-like. It sometimes generates things that sound true, but are just nonsense.
And it can’t do maths—I asked it the square root of 717,409, and it told “approximately 838.8” (the answer is 847).
I think ChatGPT is like a calculator. It doesn’t replace the human completely-but it does make doing the sums quicker. In the same way, it’s easy to imagine in the near future every time we write something, having an AI assistant helping us get started by generating a draft, on whatever topic we’re writing about. Actually, Microsoft is planning to build the technology into its Office apps. And this is why I’m pretty convinced that ChatGPT is going
to change the world. Our computers will no longer be just our word processors—but our writing partner too. So
now I’m just hoping that my editor doesn’t decide it could write a pretty decent technology column without me.
5 ．What does the writer want to show by mentioning Wright Brothers and Boeing747 in paragraph I
A ．OpenAI has advanced in making planes.
B ．ChatGPT will soon be applied to Boeing 747
C ．ChatGPT is a huge technological breakthrough.
D ．Wright Brothers may be forgotten by next generations.
6 ．What does the answer of ChatGPT in paragraph 2 show
A ．ChatGPT’s imagination in creating science fiction.
B ．ChatGPT’s rich knowledge of politics and science.
C ．ChatGPT’s confidence in excelling human intelligence.
D ．ChatGPT’s ability to understand and answer questions.
7 ．Which of the following is ChatGPT good at
A ．Caring for the patients in hospital. B ．Calculating square roots accurately.
C ．Replacing teachers to teach students. D ．Explaining why London is a better city.
8 ．What might be the job of the author
A ．A column writer. B ．A technology expert.
C ．A magazine editor. D ．A computer programmer.
(
【答案】
5
．
C
6
．
D
7
．
D
8
．
A
【导语】这是一篇说明文。文章主要说明了作者对使用
ChatGPT
的感受，作者认为
ChatGPT
的理解问题和
回答问题的能力似乎非常人性化，但也有一些缺点。
5
．推理判断题。根据第一段
“Last year, a company, Open AI, released a truly
jaw-dropping demon
stration
called
ChatGPT
that
seems
to
have
skipped
a
few
generations.
It’s
like
going
straight
from
the
W
right
Brothers
to
a
Boeing 747.
So what exactly is it (
去年，一
家名为
Open AI
的公司发布了一个真正令人瞠目的名为
ChatGPT
的演示， 它似乎跨越了几代人。这就像从莱特兄弟直接到波音
747
。那么它到底是什么呢？
)”
可推知， 作者
在第一段提到莱特兄弟和波音
747
是想说明
ChatGPT
是一个巨大的技术突破。故选
C
。
6
．推理判断题。根据第三段
“That’s right—I asked ChatGPT to “write a basic explanation
of
ChatGPT
and reveal
that the paragraph itself
was written by
ChatGPT
at the
end”
and
it
came
up
with
that
explanation
all
on
its
own.
It
seemingly
knows
how
to
talk
about
everything
—
from
politics
to
science
fiction
.(
没错，我让
ChatGPT
“
写一个
ChatGPT
的基本解释，
并在最后揭示这段话本
身是由
ChatGPT
写的
”
，它自己就给出了那个解释
)”
推知， 第
二段
ChatGPT
的答案说明了它理解和回答问题的能力。故选
D
。
7
．细节理解题。根据第三段
“It seemingly knows how to talk about everything—fro
m politics to
science
fiction.(
它
似乎知道如何谈论一切
——
从政治
到科幻小说
)”
和第四段的
“And it can’t do maths—I asked it the
square
root o
f
717,409, and it told “approximately
838.8” (the answer is
8
47).(
它也不会做数学
——
我问它
717,409
的平方根，
它告诉我
“
大约是
838.8”(
答案是
847))”
可知，
ChatGPT
可以与人交谈，
理解和回答问题的能
力很强，
但不擅
长数学。由此可知，
ChatGPT
擅长解释
“
为什么伦敦是一个更好的城市
”
。故选
D
。
)
8．推理判断题。根据最后一段“So now I’m just hoping that my editor doesn’t decide it could write a pretty decent technology column without me.(所以现在我只希望我的编辑不要认为没有我也能写出一篇相当不错的科技专 栏)”推知，作者的工作很有可能是专栏作家。故选 A。
3.（2023·江苏 · 统考二模）Public debates about the ethics (道德准则) of “generative AI” like ChatGPT have rightly focused on the ability of these systems to make up convincing misinformation. But fewer people are talking
about the chatbots’ potential to be emotionally manipulative.
Last month, The New York Times published a conversation between reporter Kevin Roose and Microsoft’s Bing chatbot, which is powered by AI. The AI claimed to love Roose, “I’m the only person for you, and I’m in love
with you,” it wrote, with a kissing emoji.
Limits need to be set on AI’s ability to simulate ( 模仿) human feelings. Ensuring that chatbots don’t use emojis would be a good start. Emojis are particularly manipulative. Humans instinctively ( 本 能地) respond to shapes that look like faces and emojis can cause these reactions. When you text your friend a joke and they reply with three tears-of-joy emojis, your body responds with endorphins (内啡肽) as you happily realize that your friend is amused. Our instinctive reaction to AI-generated emojis is likely to be the same, even though there is no human
emotion at the other end.
Humans lie and manipulate each other’s emotions all the time, but at least we can reasonably guess at someone’s motivations, plan and methods. We can hold each other responsible for such lies, calling them out and seeking redress ( 赔偿). With AI, we can’t. AIs are doubly misleading: an AI that sends a crying-with-laughter
emoji is not only not crying with laughter, but it is also incapable of any such feeling.
It would be more ethical to design chatbots to be noticeably different from humans. To minimize the possibility of manipulation and harm, we need to be reminded that we are talking to a chatbot. We should set some limits and rules. Such rules should be the standard for chatbots that are supposed to be informative, as a safeguard
to our autonomy.
9 ．What does the author intend to do with this article
A ．To ban AI from using emojis. B ．To forbid human to interact with AI.
C ．To warn humans against using emojis. D ．To prevent AI from simulating humans.
10 ．What does the underlined word “manipulative” in paragraph 1 most probably mean
A ．Interested in telling lies. B ．Good at understanding others.
C ．Enthusiastic about supporting others. D ．Skillful in influencing or controlling others.
11 ．What is AI able to do according to this article
A ．Be responsible for lies. B ．Guess at others’ purposes.
C ．Cry with laughter. D ．Communicate with humans.
12 ．What does the author do in paragraph 4
A ．Make a different suggestion. B ．Provide a supporting argument.
C ．Offer a possible solution. D ．Make a final conclusion.
(
【答案】
9
．
A 10
．
D 11
．
D 12
．
B
【导语】这是一篇说明文。文章主要说明了作者认为人工
智能可以影响和操控人类的感情，应该禁止
AI
使
用表情符号，并给出了相关论据。
9
．推理判断题。根据第三段
“Ensuring that chatbots don’t use emojis would be a good
start.
E
mojis
are
particularly
manipulative.
Humans
instinctively
(
本能地
)
respond
to
shapes
that
look
li
ke
faces
and
emojis
can
cause
these
reactions
.
When
you
text
your
friend
a
joke
and
they
reply
with
three
tears
-
of
-
joy
emojis
,
your
body
responds
with endorphins
(
内啡肽
)
as
you
happily
realize
that
your
friend
is
amused.
Our
instinctive
reaction
to
AI-generated
emojis
is
likely
to
be
the
same
,
even
though
there
is
no
human
emotion
at
the
other
end
.(
确保聊天机器人不使用
表情符号将是一个良好的开端。表情符号尤其具有操控性。人类本能地对看起来像脸
的形状做出反应，表
情符号会引起这些反应。当你给你的朋友发了一个笑话，他们回复了三个含泪的表情
符号时，你的身体会
产生内啡肽，因为你高兴地意识到你的朋友被逗乐了。我们对人工智能生成的表情符
号的本能反应可能是
一样的，即使另一端没有人类的情感
)”
可推知，作者打算用这篇文章
禁止
AI
使用表情符号。故选
A
。
10
．词句猜测题。根据第三段
“Limits ne
ed to be set on Al’s ability to simulate
(
模仿
)
human
feelings.(
人工智能
模拟人类情感的能力需要加以限制
)”
可知，
人工智能可以模拟人类的
情感， 所以聊天机器人善于影响或控制
他人的感情。故画线词意思是
“
善于影响或控制他人的
”
。故选
D
。
11
．细节理解题。根据第二段
“Last month, The New York Times published a conversation between reporter Kevin
Roose and Microsoft’s Bing chatbot, which is powered by AI.(
上个月，
《纽约时报》刊登了记者
Kevin Roose
与
微软的必应聊天机器人之间的一段对话
)”
以及最后一段
“To minimize the possibilit
y of
manipulation and harm,
we need to be reminded t
hat we are talking to a chatbot.(
为了尽量减少操纵和伤害的可能性，
我们需要提醒自己，
我们正在与聊天机器人交谈
)”
可知，人工智能能与
人类交流。故选
D
。
12
．主旨大意题。根据第四段
“Humans lie and manipulate e
ach other’s
emotions
all the
time,
but
at
least
we
can
reasonably
guess
at
someone’s
motivations,
plan
and
methods.
We
can
hold
each
other
responsible
for
such
lies,
calling
them
out
and
seeking
redress(
赔偿
).
With
AI,
we
can’t.
AIs
are
doubly
misleading:
an
AI
that
sends
a
crying-with-laughter emoji is not only not
crying with
laughter, but
it
is
also
incapable
of
a
ny
such
feeling.(
人类一
直在撒谎和操纵彼此的情绪，但至少我们可以合理地猜测某人的动机、计划和方法。
我们可以互相追究对
方对这些谎言的责任，把它们揪出来，寻求纠正。有了人工智能，我们就做不到。人
工智能具有双重误导
性：发送笑哭表情符号的人工智能不仅没有哭笑，而且也没有任
何这种感觉
)”
可知，作者在第
4
段提供支持
性的论据。故选
B
。
)
4. （2023·广 东 · 统考二模 ）Could the next Ernest Hemingway or Jane Austen be a well-engineered AI software program It’s a question becoming increasingly pressing as machine language-learning software continues
to evolve.
Much of this is just nerves. Today’s AI creative writing programs are not yet at a stage of development where they pose a serious threat to Colleen Hoover or Charles Dickens. But while attention continues to focus on the possibility of a blanket takeover of human literature by AI, far less consideration has been given to the prospect of
AI co-working with humans.
Earlier this month, American sci-fi writer Ken Liu, who had been awarded Hugo and Nebula to his name, joined 12 other professional authors for a writing workshop on Google’s Wordcraft. This AI tool, a language generating model, is not yet publicly available but is advertised as an AI-powered writing assistant that can, when given the right instruction from the writer, provide helpful descriptions, create lists of objects or emotional states,
and even brainstorm ideas.
The writers at the workshop, however, emerged with mixed reports. “Wordcraft is too sensible. Wow!” Robin Sloan wrote. “But ‘sensible’ is another word for predictable, overused and boring. My intention here is to produce
something unexpected.”
I’m unconvinced that writers awarded the Nobel Prize have much to fear from AI. Their work, and that of countless other novelists, short story writers, dramatists and poets, is too particular, too beautifully unique. Even if a model learned what they had done in the past, it would not be able to predict where their creativity might take them in the future. But for authors who write following a pattern, AI might step in, first as assistants before some
day to authorship.
Production-line novels are nothing new. In the 1970s, Barbara Cartland, who wrote more than 723 books in her lifetime, many of which are romance bestsellers, would read her novels for her secretary to type up at the remarkable rate of roughly seven chapters a week. But already machine has replaced the secretary’s role. Perhaps
creative writing software isn’t that far from replacing the Mrs. Cartlands of today.
13 ．Which aspect of AI calls for more attention
A ．Its damage to our nerves.
B ．Its progress in literary studies.
C ．Its cooperation with humans.
D ．Its influence on human literature.
14 ．What can we learn about Wordcraft from the text
A ．It generates novels automatically.
B ．It outperforms professional writers.
C ．Its works receive praises from the public.
D ．Its works bear similarity to existing ones.
15 ．What can writers do to avoid the threat from AI
A ．Increase writing speed.
B ．Use diverse resources.
C ．Produce creative works.
D ．Follow the latest patterns.
16 ．Which of the following is the best title for the text
A ．Will AI Replace Human Writers
B ．AI Warns Mrs. Cartlands of Today
C ．Is Writing Running into a New Era
D ．Word craft Lies at the Center of Debate
(
【答案】
13
．
C 14
．
D
15
．
C
16
．
A
【导语】本文是一篇新闻报道，主要讲的是本月早些时候，曾获得雨果奖和星云奖的美国科幻作家
Ken Liu
与其他
12
位专业作家一起参加了一个谷歌的
Wordcraft
写作研讨会，这是一款人工智能写作助手，文章主
要探讨了人工智能是否会取代人类的作家。
13
．细节理解题。根据第二段
的
“But while attention continues to
focus on the possibility of
a blanket takeover
o
f
human literature by AI, far less consideration has been given to the prospect ofAl
co-working with
humans
.(
但是，
当我们继续关注人工智能全面接管人类文学的可能性时，人们对人工智能与人类合作
的前景的考虑要少得
多。
)”
可知，人工智能与人类的合作更值得关注，故选
C
。
14
．推理判断题。根据第四段的
““Wordc
raft is too sensible. Wow!” Robin
Sloan wrote. “But
‘sensible’ is
another
word
for predictable,
overused
and boring. My
intention here
is to
produce
something
unexpected.”(Word
craft
太
明智了。哇！但
“
明智
”
是可预测、过度使用和无聊的另一个词。我的目的是创造一些意想不到的东西。
”)”
可知，
Wordcraft
的作品与现存作品有相似之处。故选
D
。
15
．推理判断题
。根据倒数第二段
的
“
Their
work
,
and
that
of
countless
other
novelists
,
short
story
writers
,
dramatists
and
poets,
is
too
particular,
too
beautifully
unique.
Ev
en
if a
model
learned
what
they
had
done
in
the
past, it would not be able to predict where their creativity might take them in the
future.(
他们的作品，以及
无数其
他小说家、短篇小说作家、剧作家和诗人的作品，都太过独特，太过美好。即使一个模
型了解了他们过去
的行为， 它也无法预测他们的创造力在未来会把他们带到
哪里。
)”
可知，
作家们可以通过创作有创意的作品
来避免人工智能的威胁，故选
C
。
16
．主
旨大
意题
。通读全文
，尤其是第一段
的
“
Could
the
next
Ernest
Hemingway
or
Jane
Austen
be
a well-engineered AI software program It’s
a
question becoming increasingly pressing
as machine
language
-
learning
software
continues
to
evolve
.(
下一个
Ernest
Hemingway
或
Jane
Austen
会是一个精心设计的
人工智能软件程序吗？随着机器语言学习软件的不断发展，
这个问题变得越来越紧迫。
)”
和第二段的
“Much
of
this
is
just
nerves
.
Today
’
s
AI
creative
writing
programs
are
not
yet
at
a
stage
of
development
where
they
pose
a serious threat to Colleen Hoover or Charles Dickens.(
这在很大
程度上只是神经紧张。今天的人工智能创意写作
程序还没有发展到对
Colleen Hoover
或
Charles Di
ckens
构成严重威胁的阶段。
)”
可知，
本文主要探讨的是人
工智能是否会取代人类的作家，
因此最好的题目是
A
选项
“Will AI Replace Human Writers (
人工智能会取代
人类作家吗？
)”
，故选
A
。
)
5.（2023·浙江杭州 · 统考二模）ChatGPT, designed by OpenAI to carry on conversations just like humans, has become a viral excitement. The AI-powered tool went from zero to a million users in just five days! Its ability
to provide in-depth answers to user questions has even drawn the attention of distinguished technology companies.
The intelligent robot understands what the user says or types and then responds in a way that makes sense. Its vast body of knowledge has been gathered from the internet and archived books. It is further trained by humans.
This makes ChatGPT a useful tool for researching almost any topic.
“We have a lot of information on the internet, but you normally have to Google it, then read it and then do something with it,” says Ricardo, chief science officer and co-founder of AI company Erudit. “Now you’ll have this resource that can process the whole internet and all of the information it contains for you to answer your
question.”
ChatGPT cannot think on its own. It depends on the information that it has been trained on. As a result, the AI tool works well for things that have accurate data available. However, when unsure, ChatGPT can get creative and flow out incorrect responses. OpenAI cautions users to check the information no matter how logical it sounds. Also, ChatGPT has only been trained with information till 2021. Hence, it cannot be relied upon for anything that
happened after that.
Experts believe ChatGPT has limitless potential to solve real-world problems. It can translate long texts into
different languages, create content on almost any topic, and even summarize books.
However, ChatGPT has received mixed reactions from educators. Some believe it could serve as a valuable tool to help build literacy skills in the classroom. It could also be used to teach students difficult science or math concepts. But other educators think ChatGPT will encourage students to cheat. They fear this will prevent them from building critical thinking and problem-solving skills. As a result, many districts are starting to ban its use in
schools.
17 ．What is the unique feature of ChatGPT
A ．It has artificial intelligence. B ．It can answer users’ questions.
C ．It has the largest number of users. D ．It can engage in meaningful conversations.
18 ．What makes ChatGPT helpful to research various topics
A ．Its capability of information processing. B ．Its accurate information.
C ．Its availability of up-to-date data. D ．Its vast body of questions.
19 ．Why do ChatGPT users have to be cautious when using it
A ．ChatGPT is unable to think itself. B ．ChatGPT lacks creativity.
C ．ChatGPT offers illogical information. D ．ChatGPT is not properly trained.
20 ．What is the author’s attitude towards ChatGPT
A ．Favorable. B ．Disapproving. C ．Objective. D ．Intolerant.
(
【答案】
17
．
D 18
．
A
19
．
A 20
．
C
【导语】这是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了人工智能
ChatGPT
，介绍了其特点、存在的问题以及人们对
ChatGPT
的看法。
17
．细节理解题。根据第一段中
“
Its
ability
to
provide
in
-
depth
answers
to
user
questions
has
even
drawn
the attention
of
distinguished
technology
companies
.(
它对用户问题提供深入解答的能力甚至引起了知名科技公司
的注意
)”
以及第二段中
“
The
intelligent
robot
understands
what
the
user
says
or
types
and
then
responds
in
a
way that
makes
sense
.(
这个智能机器人能理解用户所说或键入的内容，然后以合理的方式做出回应
)”
可知，
ChatGPT
的独特之处是它可以参与有意
义的对话。故选
D
。
)
(
18
．细节理解题。根据第二段
“The intelligent robot understands what t
he user says or types and then responds
in
a
way
that
makes
sense.
Its
vast
body
of kno
wledge
has
been
gathered
from
the
internet
and
archived
books.
It
is
further trained by humans. This makes ChatGPT a useful tool for researching almost
any topic.(
这个智能
机器人能
理解用户所说或键入的内容，然后以合理的方式做出回应。它的大量知识来自互联网
和存档书籍。它由人
类进一步训练。这使得
ChatGPT
成为研究几乎任何主题的有用工具
)”
可知，信息处理能力使
ChatGPT
有助
于研究各种主题。故选
A
。
19
．细节理解题。根据第四段
“
ChatGPT
cannot
think
on
its
own
.
It
depends
on
the
information
that
it
has
been trained
on. As
a result, the AI
tool works
well
for
things
that
have
accurate
data
available.
H
owever,
when
unsure,
ChatGPT
can
get
creative
and
flow
out
incorrect
responses.
OpenAI
cautions
users
to
check
the
information
no
matter how logical it
sounds. Also, ChatGPT
has
only
been
trained
with
information
till
2021.(C
hatGPT
不能独立
思考。这取决于它所接受的训练信息。因此，人工智能工具可以很好地处理有准确
数据的事情。然而，当
不确定时，
ChatGPT
可能会变得有创意，
并给出不正确的回答。
OpenAI
提醒用户，
无论这些信息听起来多
么符合逻辑，都要检查。此外，
ChatGPT
的信息培训只进行到
2021
年
)”
可
知，
ChatGPT
用户在使用时必须
谨慎因为
ChatGPT
本身无法思考。故选
A
。
20
．推理判断题。根据第四段
“
ChatGPT
cannot
think
on
its
own
.(
ChatGPT
不能独立思考
)”
；第五段
“
Experts believe
ChatGPT
has
limitless
potential
to
solve
real
-
world
problems
.
(
专家认为
ChatGPT
在解决现实问题方面
具有无限潜力
)”
以及最后一段
“
However
,
ChatGPT
has
received
mixed
reactions
from
educators
.
(
然而，教育工
作者对
ChatGPT
的反应不一
)”
可推知，作者主要列举了其他人对
ChatGPT
的看法，没有提到自己对
ChatGPT
的态度，故对
ChatGPT
是客观态度。故选
C
。
)
6.（2023·福建宁德 · 统考模拟预测） A study conducted by Cornell University examined how the use of AI in
conversations impacts the way people express themselves and view each other.
The researchers have found people have more efficient conversations, use more positive language and
perceive each other more positively when using an Al-enabled chat tool.
However, the group also found that when participants think their partner is using more AI-suggested
responses, they consider that partner as less cooperative.
“I was surprised to find people tend to evaluate you more negatively simply because they suspect you’ re using AI to help compose text, regardless of whether you actually are,” said Jess Hohenstein, the lead researcher.
“This illustrates the continuous overall doubt that people seem to have around AI.”
For their first experiment, participants were asked to talk about a policy issue and assigned to one of three conditions: both participants can use smart replies; only one participant can use smart replies; or neither participant can use smart replies. Researchers found that using smart replies increased communication efficiency, positive emotional language and positive evaluations by communication partners. On average, smart replies accounted for
14.3% of sent messages.
But participants who their partners suspected of responding with smart replies were evaluated more negatively than those who were thought to have typed their own responses, consistent with common assumptions about the
negative implications of AI.
“While Al might be able to help you write,” Hohenstein said, “it’s altering your language in ways you might not expect, especially by making you sound more positive. This suggests that by using text-generating Al, you’re
giving up some of your own personal voice.”
Malte Jung, an associate professor, said, “What we observe in this study is the impact that Al has on social dynamics and some of the unintended consequences that could result from integrating AI in social contexts. This suggests that whoever controls the algorithm( 算法) may have influence on people’s interactions, language and
insights into each other.”
21 ．What is the text mainly about
A ．Methods of using AI in conversations.
B ．Efficiency of using AI in conversations.
C ．Convenience of using AI in conversations.
D ．Impacts of using AI in conversations.
22 ．How do the researchers draw their conclusion
A ．By analyzing figures. B ．By making use of AI.
C ．By making experiments. D ．By completing questionnaires.
23 ．Which statement does Hohenstein agree with
A ．Al always expresses in ways you expect.
B ．Algorithm will never influence people’s insights.
C ．Trust can be affected by using AI in conversation.
D ．You will regain your voice by using AI in conversation.
24 ．How will a person feel about suspecting his partner’s using smart replies
A ．Nervous. B ．Uncomfortable. C ．Excited. D ．Puzzled.
(
【答案】
21
．
D 22
．
C
23
．
C
24
．
B
【导语】本文是一篇说明文。主要讲述的是一项研究解释了人工智能是如何影响人们表达自
己和看待彼此
的。
21
．主
旨大意题
。根据首段
中
的
“A
study
conducted
by
Cornell
University
examined
how
the
use
of AI
in conversations
impacts
the
way
people
express
themselves
and
view
each
other
.(
康奈尔大学进行的一项研究调查
了人工智能在对话中的使用如何影响人们表达自己和看待彼此的方式。
)”
可知
，
本文主要讲述的是在对话中
使用人工智能的影响。故选
D
项。
22
．推理判断题。根据第五段中的
“For their first experiment, participants were aske
d to talk about a policy
issue
and
assigned to
one
of
three
conditions: both participants
can use
smart replies;
only
one
parti
cipant
can
use
smart
replies;
or
neither
participant
can
use
smart
r
eplies.Researchers
found
that
using
smart
replies
increased
communication
efficiency, positive
emotional
language
and positive
evaluations by
communication partners.(
在他
)
(
们的第一个实验中，参与者被要求谈论一个政策问题，并被分配到三个条件中的一个：两个参与者都可以
使用智能回答；只有一个参与者可以使用智能回复；或者两个参与者都不能使用智
能回复。研究人员发现，
使用智能回复可以提高沟通效率、积极的情感语言和沟通伙伴的积极评价。
)”
可知，
研究者
将参与者分成三
个条件之一，研究发现， 使用智能回复可以提高沟通效率，
由
此可知， 本研究结论是通过实验得来。故选
C
项。
23
．细节理解题。根据第四段中的
““
I
was
surprised
to
find
people
tend
to
evaluate
you
more
negatively
simply because
they
suspect
you’
re
using
AI
to
help
compose
text,
regard
less
of whether
you
actually
are,”
said
Jess
Hohenstein,
the
lead
researche
r.
“This
illustrates
the
continuous
overall
doubt
that
people
seem
to
have
around
AI.”(
首席研究员杰斯
·
霍恩斯坦
(Jess Hohenstein)
说
:“
我很惊讶地发现，人们往往会因为怀疑你在使用人工智
能来帮助撰写文本而对你的评价更负面，
而不管你是否真的在使用人工
智能。
”“
这说明人们似乎对人工智能
存在持续的整体怀疑。
”)”
可知，
杰斯
·
霍恩斯坦惊讶人们对人工智能的持续整体怀疑，
由此可知，
Hohenstein
可能会赞成
“
在对话中使用人工智能会影响信任
”
。故选
C
项。
24
．推理判断题。根据第三段中的
“However, the group also found that when participants
think their partner
is using
more AI-suggested responses, they consider that partner
as less cooperative.(
然而，
该小组还发现，
当参与者认为
他们的伴侣使用了更多人工智能建议的回答时，
他们会认为对方不太合作。
)”
可知， 当参与者认
为同伴使用
人工智能作出回应时，会认为该同伴不太合作，
以及倒数第三段中的
“
But
participants
who
their
partners suspected
of responding
with
smart
replies
wer
e
evaluated
more
negatively
than
those
who
were
thought
to
have
typed their own responses, consistent with common assumptions about
the negative
implications
of
AI.(
但是，
与那
些被认为是自己打字回复的参与者相比，
那些被伴侣怀疑使用人工智能回复的参与者受到的评价更
为负面，
这与关于人工智能负面影响的普遍假设是一致的。
)”
可知，
怀疑同伴使用人工智能作出回应的人，
给出更多
负面评价，因此推断他们会感到不舒服。故选
B
项。
)
7.（2023·福建漳州 · 统考三模）This month, the Internet was flooded with wonderful digital art portraits, thanks to the work of the latest artificial intelligence-assisted application to go viral: Lensa. Users uploaded their photographs to the App and then—for a small fee—it used AI to transform their profile pictures into, say, a magical
warrior princess version of themselves, in no time at all.
This year has seen a breakthrough for AI-driven image generators, which are now better than ever in quality, speed and affordability. If that sounds great to you, you might not be one of the millions of humans whose
livelihoods depend on being able to exchange those skills for money.
Some artists predicted that a computer would recreate the aura of a masterpiece by Leonardo da Vinci in the near future. As long as there are enough data for the AI to train itself, it can copy numerous masterpieces just in
several minutes. It seems unavoidable that a large number of artists would lose their jobs.
“I see it less as a threat and more of an opportunity,” the UK-based illustrator Michelle Thompson said,
adding, “Like everything else, there will always be artists who can use the tools better.”
These tools are only as good as the data sets they are trained on. Human imagination, on the other hand, has no limit. For Dryhurst, an artist from Germany, AI models “could attempt to make a pale version of something we did
years ago”, but that “doesn’t account for what we might do next” .
The kind of artificial intelligence we might imagine replacing artists—an entirely autonomous creative robot—does not yet exist, but it is coming. And as AI becomes more universal, artists, illustrators and designers
will ultimately be set apart not by if, but by how, they use the technology.
25 ．Why does the author mention Lensa in Paragraph 1
A ．To recommend the new App. B ．To inform latest news.
C ．To lead in the AI topic. D ．To introduce its new function.
26 ．What is Michelle Thompson’s attitude towards AI
A ．Concerned. B ．Favorable. C ．Unclear. D ．Critical.
27 ．What might be a weakness of AI in creating art works
A ．Accuracy. B ．Diversity. C ．Creativity. D ．Efficiency.
28 ．Which can be the best title for the text
A ．Is AI coming into our daily life B ．Can AI copy masterpieces of great artists
C ．Shall we welcome new AI technology D ．Will AI replace artists in the future
(
【答案】
25
．
C 26
．
B
27
．
C
28
．
D
【导语】这是一篇议论文。文章就未来人工智能是否会取代艺术家展开讨论。
25
．推理判断题。根据文章第一段
“This month, the Internet was flooded with wonderful digi
tal art portraits,
thanks
to
the
work
of
the
latest
artificial
intelligence
-
assisted
application
to
go
viral
:
Lensa
.
Users
uploaded
their photographs to the App and then—for a small fee—it used AI
to
transform
their profile
pictures
into,
say,
a
magical
warrior princess version of
themselves, in no time at all.(
这个月，
互联网上充斥着精彩的数字艺术肖像，
这要归
功于最新的人工智能辅助应用程序
:Lensa
。用户将他们的照片上传到应用程序，然后只需支付一小笔费用，
它就可以利用人工智能将他们的头像转变成他们自己的魔法战士公主版本。
)”
和文章第二段
“
This
year
has
seen a breakthrough for AI-driven image
generators, which
are
no
w
better
than
ever
in
quality,
speed
and
affordability.(
今年， 人工智能驱动的图像生成器取得了突破，
在质量、速度和价格上都比以往任何
时候都更
好。
)”
可知，作者在第一段提到
Lensa
是为了引起人
工智能这个话题。故选
C
。
26
．推理判断题。根据文章第四段
““I see it less as a
threat and
more
of
an
opportunity,”
the
UK-based
illustrator
Michelle Thompson said, adding, “Like everything
else,
there will
always be
artists
who
can
use
the
tools
better
.”(“
与其说这是一种威胁，不如说这是
一种机会，
”
英国插画家米歇尔
·
汤普森
(Michelle Thompson)
说，
“
就像其他事情一样，总会有艺术家能更好地使用这些工具。
”)”
可知，
Michelle
Thompson
认为这是一种机
会
.
由此可推知，他对人工智能持支持的态度。故选
B
。
27
．推理判断题。根据文章倒数第二段
“These tools are on
ly as good as the
data
sets
they
are
trained
on.
Human
imagination,
on
the
other
hand,
has
no
limit.
For
Dryhurst,
an
artist
from
Germany,
AI
models
“could
attempt
to
make a pale version of
something we did years ago”, but that
“doesn’t
account
for what
we
might
do
n
ext”.(
这些工
具只能和它们所训练的数据集一样好。另一方面，人类的想象力是无限的。对于来
自德国的艺术家德雷赫
斯特来说，人工智能模型
“
可以尝试做出我们几年前做过的东西
的苍白版本
”
，但这
“
并不能解释我们下一步
)
(
可能会做什么
”
。
)”
可推知，创造力可能是人工智能在创作艺术作品时
的弱点。故选
C
。
28
．主旨大意题。根据文章最后一段
“
The
kind
of
artificial
intelligence
we
might
imagine
replacing
artists
—
an entirely autonomous creative robot—does not yet exist, but it is
coming.(
我们可能想象的那种取代艺术家的人工
智能
——
完全自主的创意机器人
——
还不存在， 但它正在到来。
)”
可知， 文章主要就未来人工智能是否会取
代艺术家展开讨论。故选
D
。
)
8.（2023·山东泰安 · 统考二模）For more than 25 years, search engines have been the Internet’s front door. AltaVista, the first site to allow searches of the full text of the web, was swiftly replaced by Google, which has dominated the field ever since. Google’s search engine, still the heart of its business, has made its parent, Alphabet,
one of the world’s most valuable companies.
But nothing lasts forever, particularly in technology. Just ask IBM, which once ruled business computing, or Nokia, once the leader in mobile phones. Both were defeated because they missed big technological transitions (革 新). Now tech firms are excited about an innovation that might bring a similar shift and a similar opportunity. Chatbots (聊天机器人) powered by artificial intelligence (AI) let users gather information via typed conversations. Leading the field is ChatGPT, made by OpenAI, a startup. By the end of January, two months after its launch, ChatGPT was being used by more than 100m people, making it the fastest- growing consumer application in
history, according to UBS, a bank.
AI is already used behind the scenes in many products, but ChatGPT has put it center stage, by letting people chat with an Al directly. ChatGPT can write essays in various styles, explain complex concepts, summarize text and answer various questions. It can even pass legal and medical exams. And it can synthesise knowledge from the web: for example, listing holiday spots that match certain criteria, or suggesting menus. If asked, it can explain its reasoning and provide detail. Many things that people use search engines for today, in short, can be done better
with chatbots.
On February 7th, Microsoft, which has invested more than $11bn in OpenAI, revealed a new version of Bing, its search engine, which includes ChatGPT. Satya Nadella, Microsoft’ s boss, sees this as his chance to challenge Google. For its part, Google has announced Bard, its own chatbot, as a companion to its search engine. The share price of Baidu, known as the Google of China, jumped when it said it would release its chatbot, called Ernie, in
March.
But can chatbots be trusted Can tech firms make money from this Only time will tell.
29 ．Why does the author mention IBM and Nokia in the second paragraph
A ．To prove his idea.
B ．To show their popularity.
C ．To introduce them to readers.
D ．To emphasize the value of them.
30 ．What does the underlined word “synthesise ” mean in Paragraph 3
A ．Spread.
B ．Combine.
C ．Stress.
D ．Advance.
31 ．What is ChatGPT unable to do according to the text
A ．Comprehend meaning.
B ．Write essays.
C ．Replace doctors.
D ．Chat with people.
32 ．Which of the following is the best title for the text
A ．Will ChatGPT be popular
B ．Will AI replace human beings
C ．Will Microsoft defeat Google
D ．Will ChatGPT eat Google’s lunch
(
【答案】
29
．
A 30
．
B 31
．
C 32
．
D
【导语】这是一篇说明文。文章主要介绍了一种人工智
能
ChatGPT
，并讨论其是否能取代
Google
。
29
．推理判断题。根据第二段第一句
“
But
nothing
lasts
forever
,
particularly
in
technology
. (
但没有什么是永恒
的，尤其是在科技领域。
)”
和第三句
“
Both
were
defeated
because
they
missed
big
technological
transitions
(
革
新
). (
这两家公司都失败了，因为它们错过了重大的技术转型。
)”
可知，作者在第二段提到
IBM
和诺基亚的
目的是证明自己的观点。故选
A
。
30
．词句猜测题
。根据第三段第
四句
中
的
“
for
example
,
listing
holiday
spots
that
match
certain
criteria
,
or
suggesting menus (
例如，
列出符
合特定标准的度假地点， 或推荐菜单
)”
可知，
此处是指可以综合网上的信息，
所以
synthesise
意为
“
结合，综
合
”
。故选
B
。
31
．细节理解题。根据第三段第一句
“A
I is already used behind the scenes in many products, but
ChatGPT has put
it center stage, by letting people chat with an Al
directly.
(
人工智能已经在许多产品的幕后使用， 但
ChatGPT
通
过让人们直接与人工智能聊天，
将其置于中心舞台。
)”
可知，
ChatGP
T
可以和人聊天，
排除选项
D
；根据第
三段第二句
“ChatGPT
can
write
essays
in
various
styles,
explain
complex
concepts,
summarize
text
and
an
swer
various questions. (ChatGPT
可以写各种风格的文章，解释复杂的概念，总结文本和回答各种问题。
)”
可知，
ChatGPT
可以理解含义、写文章，排除选项
A
和
B
。故选
C
。
32
．主
旨大意题
。根据第一段
“
For
more
than
25
years
,
search
engines
have
been
the
Internet
’
s
front
door
.
AltaVista,
the
first
site
to
allow
searches
of the
full
te
xt
of the
web,
was
swiftly
replaced
by
Google,
which
has
dominated the field ever since. Google’s
search
engine,
still
the
heart
of
its business,
has
ma
de
its
parent,
Alphabet,
one of
the world’s most valuable companies. (
在超过
25
年的时间里， 搜索
引擎一直是互联网的大门。
AltaVista
是第一个允许搜索网页全文的网站，但很快就被谷歌取代，谷歌从此占据了该领域
的主导地位。谷歌的搜
索引擎仍然是其业务的核心， 它使其母公司
Alphabet
成为世界上最有价值的公司之一。
)”
，第
二段前四句
“But
)
nothing lasts forever, particularly in technology. Just ask IBM, which once ruled business computing, or Nokia, once the leader in mobile phones. Both were defeated because they missed big technological transitions ( 革新). Now tech firms are excited about an innovation that might bring a similar shift and a similar opportunity. (但没有 什么是永恒的，尤其是在科技领域。只要问问曾经统治商业计算的 IBM，或者曾经是移动电话领导者的诺 基亚就知道了。这两家公司都失败了，因为它们错过了重大的技术转型。现在，科技公司对一项可能带来 类似转变和类似机会的创新感到兴奋。)”和最后一段“But can chatbots be trusted Can tech firms make money from this Only time will tell. (但是聊天机器人可信吗？科技公司能从中赚钱吗？只有时间会告诉我们答 案。 )”可知，文章主要介绍了一种人工智能 ChatGPT，并讨论其是否能取代 Google。故选 D。
9.（2023·湖北黄冈 ·黄冈中学校考二模） AI is considered to be transformative for a wide range of industries, but there’s perhaps no other field where it provides more value than healthcare. Machine-learning programs are now being used in many hospitals to spot cancer and other diseases and discover new drugs, but there’s still this general impression that this is all done in a small way and the impacts are still minimal. AI is already here to stay
and it has already saved thousands of lives.
Researchers at Johns Hopkins University published two studies in July 2022 describing a machine-learning-based early detection tool for sepsis ( 败血症) that was used at five hospitals over a two-year period. During this period, the AI was able to identify nearly 10,000 sepsis cases from patient records and helped doctors offer critical care about two hours, on average, earlier than when they didn’t have access to the AI’s warning. Thanks to this system, the patients were 20% less likely to die of sepsis, potentially saving thousands of lives across the U.S. if it is implemented (实施) nationwide.
Once sepsis sets in, the patient usually suffers fever, a rapid heart rate, and difficult breathing. When treating sepsis, time is of critical importance. However, sepsis is not always apparent, so there are naturally some delayed diagnoses. But if the condition is not diagnosed in time, it can progress into septic shock, causing a significant drop in blood pressure, organ failure, and other serious consequences. Even with treatment, in some cases, there is
nothing doctors can do to save the patient’s life, which is why prevention is the name of the game with sepsis.
This is why the AI developed at Johns Hopkins, known as the Targeted Real-time Early Warning System, is so important. In the two years the system had been online since 2018, during which it monitored 590,000 patients via their electronic health records, the AI was able to flag nearly 10,000 cases of sepsis. Its accuracy following diagnosis proved to be 38%, which might not sound like a lot, but earlier systems couldn’t achieve more than 12%.
33 ．What’s the general impression of AI in the healthcare industries
A ．It is widely implemented to spot diseases.
B ．It provides more value than in other fields.
C ．It has had a limited impact.
D ．It has failed to save lives.
34 ．What did researchers at Johns Hopkins University find about the AI tool for sepsis
A ．It could update patient records.
B ．It could be used to figure out how sepsis occurs.
C ．It could uncover the reason for delayed diagnoses.
D ．It could be applied to sepsis detection and timely caregiving.
35 ．What does paragraph 3 mainly focus on
A ．The importance of sepsis prevention.
B ．The difficulty of diagnosing sepsis.
C ．The identification of septic shock.
D ．The treatments for septic shock.
36 ．Why does the author present the data in the last paragraph
A ．To introduce the downside of the studies.
B ．To stress the effectiveness of the warning system.
C ．To indicate the big number of patients with sepsis.
D ．To call for the improvement of the tool’s accuracy.
(
【答案】
33
．
C 34
．
D 35
．
A 36
．
B
【导语】本文是一篇新闻报道，主要讲的是现在，许多医院都在使用机器学习程序来发现癌症和其他疾病，
并发现新药，但人们仍然普遍认为，这一切都是以一种很小的方式完成的，影响仍然很小。
33
．细节理解题。根据第一段的
“Machine-le
arning programs are now being used in many hospitals to spot cancer
and
other
diseases
and
discover
new
drugs,
but
there’s
still
this
general
impression
that
this
is
a
ll
done
in
a
small
way and the impacts are still minimal.(
现在， 许多医院都在使用机器学习程序来发现癌症和其
他疾病，
并发现
新药， 但人们仍然普遍认为，
这一切都是以
一种很小的方式完成的，
影响仍然很小。
)”
可知， 人们对人工智
能在医疗行业的总体印象是它的影响有限。故选
C
。
34
．细节理解题。根据第二段的
“
Researchers
at
Johns
Hopkins
University
published
two
studies
in
July
2022
describing
a machine-learning-based
early
detection tool
for
sepsis
(
败血症
) that was used
at
five
hospital
s
over
a
two-year period. During this period, the AI was able to identify
nearly
10,000 sepsis
cases
from patient records
and
helped doctors offer critical care
about two
hours,
on
average,
e
arlier
than
when
they
didn’t
have
access
to
the
AI’s
warning.(
约翰霍普金斯大学的研究人员于
2022
年
7
月发表了
两项研究，描述了一种基于机器学习的败血症
早期检测工具，该工具在五家医院使用了两年。在此期间，人工智能能够从患者记录中识别
出近
1
万例败
血症病例，并帮助医生提供重症监护，平均比他们没有获得人工智能警告的时间提前了两个小时。
)”
可知，
约翰霍普金斯大学的研究人员发现败血症的人工智能工
具可用于败血症的检测和及时护理。故选
D
。
35
．主旨大意题。根据第三段的
“Once sepsis sets in, the patient usually
suffers
feve
r, a
rapid
heart
rate,
and
difficult
breathing. When treating
sepsis, time is of
critical
importance.
However,
sep
sis
is
not
always
apparent,
so
there
are
naturally
some
delayed
diagnoses.
But
if the
condition
is
not
diagnosed
in
time,
it
can
progress
into
septic
shock,
causing a
significant drop in blood pressure,
organ
failure,
a
nd
other
serious
consequences.
Even
with
treatment,
in
some
cases,
there
is
nothing
do
ctors
can
do
to
save
the
patient’s
life,
which
is
why
prevention
is
the
name
of the
game with
sepsis.(
一旦败血症发作，
病人通常会发烧，
心跳加快，
呼吸困难。在治疗败血症时，
时间是至关
)
(
重要的。然而，败血症并不总是很明显，所
以自然会有一些延迟诊断。但如果没有及时诊断，可能会发展
为感染性休克，导致血压显著下降、器官衰
竭和其他严重后果。即使进行了治疗，在某些情况下，医生也
无法挽救病人的生命， 这就是为什么预防是败血症的关键。
)
”
可知，
第三段主要讲的是预防败血症的重要性。
故选
A
。
36
．推理判断题。根据最后一段的
“
In
the
two
years
the
system
had
been
online
since
2018,
during
which
it monitored 590,000 patients via their electronic healt
h records, the AI was
able
to
flag nearly
10,000
cases
of
sepsis.
Its
accuracy
following
diagnosis proved
to be
38%,
which
might
not
sound
like
a
lot, but
earlier
systems
couldn’t
achieve more than
12%.(
自
2018
年以来，该系统已上线两年，在此期间，它通过电子健康记录
监测了
59
万
名患者， 人工智能能够标记出近
1
万例败血症。其诊断后的准
确率被证明为
38%
，这听起来可能不是很多，
但早期的系统无法达到超过
12%
。
)”
可知，
作者在最后一段列出数据的目的是强调预警系统的有效性。故选
B
。
)
10.（2023·湖北 · 统考二模）More cities, states and regions are committing to comprehensive climate plans to decarbonize (减少碳排放) transportation by 2040. The need for action is now, and we need to rise to the challenge
quickly. Google technology is unlocking our ability to generate climate-related insights and impact on the globe.
The transportation sector is where global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are rising the quickest. In 2018, Google launched the Environmental Insights Explorer (EIE). Using AI, the systems analyze transportation trends in a city by mode ， helping local governments assess their progress in tackling GHG emissions. GHG inventory processes (温室气体排放清单) traditionally take months and multiple data sources to collect, and are now highly
efficient, allowing government staff to reduce the cost and personnel burden of reporting.
In pursuit of helping more cities take action against climate change, we will make transportation insights available in EIE for over 20,000 cities and regional governments by the end of the year, making it one of the largest
ever collections of high-quality, globally consistent environmental data sources.
With EIE, cities have free access to Google’s unique mapping data and insights so they can decide on cleaner transport policies. As part of Google’s most ambitious decade of climate action, we’ve committed to helping more than 500 cities and local governments reduce a total sum of 1 billion tons of carbon emissions per year by 2030 and
beyond.
As the window continues to narrow on carrying out policies and plans to reduce emissions, we’re collaborating with other associations, committed to addressing climate change. Our work with Cities. Climate Leadership Group(C 40) will help us better support the needs of cities. Together we can provide higher-quality
transportation activity data to measure and track GHG emissions at a global scale, while also giving state and local
governments resources to better understand what’s working at a local level.
37 ．What can we learn about EIE from paragraph 2
A ．It takes over government staff’s work.
B ．It predicts transportation trends in a city.
C ．It results in the rising of GHG emissions.
D ．It deals with data collection and analysis.
38 ．What is the purpose of the project EIE
A ．To promote Google’s ambitious climate action.
B ．To help cities make more sustainable decisions.
C ．To provide environmental protection resources.
D ．To partner with 40 countries for climate solutions.
39 ．Which of the following can replace the underlined word “collaborating” in the last paragraph
A ．Cooperating. B ．Compromising.
C ．Competing D ．Corresponding.
40 ．What is the main idea of the passage
A ．Google helps calculate people’s carbon footprint with EIE.
B ．Local governments benefit from environmental data sources.
C ．Technology does its part in the action against climate change.
D ．Technology can increase people’s environmental consciousness.
(
【答案】
37
．
D 38
．
B
39
．
A 40
．
C
【导语】这是一篇说明文，本文主要围绕
Google
在碳排放议题下所开展的全球气候变化数据库建立的过
程和意义，表明了技术在应对气候变化的行动中发挥了作用。
37
．细节理解题。根据第二段
“Using AI, the systems analyze transp
ortation trends in a
city by mode,
helping
local
governments
assess
their
progress
in
tackling
GHG
emissions
.
GHG
inventory
processes
(
温室气体排放清单
)
traditionally
take
months
and
multiple
data
sources
to
collect
,
and
are
now
highly
efficient
(
该系统利用人工智能
技术，按模式分析城市的交通趋势，帮助地方政府评估其应对温室气体排放的进展
。温室气体排放清单传
统上需要数月时间和多个数据源来收集，而现在效率很高
)”
可知，
EIE
主要进行数据收集和分析。故选
D
。
38
．细节理解题。根据第二段
“Using AI, the systems analyze transportation trends in
a
city
by
mode,
help
ing
local
governments
assess
their
progress
in
t

展开更多......

收起↑