资源简介 2026年上海市春季高考英语作文深度解析(体育课活动推荐信)原题回顾VI. Guided WritingDirections: Write an English composition in 120-150 words according to the instructions given below in Chinese.56.学校要在下学期开设新的体育活动课(sports activity class),总共有四个项目选择。请你通过比较后,选择一个你认为最推荐和最不推荐的项目,并说明理由。项目A 项目B 项目C 项目Dkite flying volleyball chess street dancing考情分析这次春考作文完美契合了上海高考英语作文的核心考察方向——聚焦“校园+社会+文化”三维,强化“语篇写作”的真实互动感。注意:不少同学容易陷入罗列理由的误区,忽略了“推荐与不推荐”的对比逻辑,以及语篇的连贯性。命题趋势结合近年高考作文,这几个关键点一定要记牢:书信/邮件类:绝对主力,18篇真题中占15篇,备考时要重点练习书信格式,掌握不同场景的常用表达;半语境作文:高频形式,先读懂题目给出的语境,再根据命题要求写作,核心是贴合语境;新综合类作文:陈述类、信息类、想象类、创新类融合,考察多维度表达能力。通用策略词数达标:18分以上作文词数通常180+;20分及以上需达到200词左右,词数不足会直接影响内容充实度评分。句型升级:这是拉开差距的核心!至少要用到5-8句高分句型,比如强调句、倒装句、从句等。逻辑连贯:有效使用连接成分,比如表递进(besides、furthermore)、表对比(however、on the contrary)、表总结(in conclusion、in short)的连接词/短语,让全文结构更紧凑。重点评分内容内容:必须覆盖题目所有要点!比如本次春考,要明确“最推荐+最不推荐”两个选择,且各自理由充分,缺一个要点就会直接扣分;语言:体现高中英语水平!要应用高中所学的语法结构和词汇,避免使用过于简单的初中词汇和句型。结构:逻辑清晰、流畅!段落划分合理,语句间连接自然,不能出现“前言不搭后语”的情况,阅卷老师一眼就能看懂你的写作思路,才会给高分。段落布局1.主体段(3句):开门见山,明确给出“最推荐的课程”和“最不推荐的课程”,简要总述核心理由,避免冗余; 2.展开段1(4-6句):详细阐述“最推荐课程”的理由,结合校园场景(如提升同学协作能力、适配体育课核心目标)、个人体验或社会层面的意义(如培养运动兴趣、传承体育精神); 3.展开段2(4-6句):合理说明“最不推荐课程”的理由,避免绝对化表述,可从课程适配性、实施难度等角度切入;4. 结尾段(3号):总结观点,呼应开头,可适当升华。作文构建P1背景,选择, 写作目的 有四个选项,最推荐chess,最不推荐kite flying,以下是理由 P2 理由 (中心句、论述) 中心句topic sentence: A(最推荐:象棋)——B(好处:锻炼专注力)——C(好处:提升学习) 论述: -背景background:现代社会,社交媒体盛行,分散学生注意力 -解释explanation:通过下象棋,让学生能够进行深度和全面地思考,锻炼了专注力,这对各科学习有一定的帮助,例如解决复杂的数学题 -对比comparison:其他运动,对专注力要求没有那么高P3理由 (中心句、论述) 中心句topic sentence: A(最不推荐:放风筝)——B(坏处:触碰到电线)——C(坏处:不安全) 论述: -背景background:高中生忙于学习,缺乏一些安全意识 -解释explanation:学校电线密布,操作不当,风筝容易悬挂在电线上 -对比comparison:其他运动,相对安全P4总结 总而言之,根据以上理由,最推荐下象棋,最不推荐放风筝P1:背景+选择+写作目的There are four choices for the new sports program. From my perspective,chess is highly recommended, while kite flying is not advisable for the following reasons.P2:最推荐(象棋)—— 理由中心句:My reason for recommending chess is that it can enhance students’ ability to focus,which facilitates their academic performance.背景:This is particularly true in modern society where social media is prevalent,distracting teenagers’ attention.解释:Not only can participating in this conventional activity enable them to think deeply and thoroughly but also foster their concentration,which is instrumental to their learning of multiple disciplines,especially when addressing complicated math problems.P3:最不推荐(放风筝)—— 理由中心句:On the contrary,the reason why flying kites is not recommended is that it may be detrimental to teenagers’ physical safety,since there is a possibility that the kites will get tangled in electrical wires.背景句:It’s common knowledge that high school students are overwhelmed by intense academic pressure and lack adequate safety awareness.解释:Schools are surrounded by high-rise buildings and dense electrical wires. If operated improperly, the kites may easily get stuck on them.对比:Compared with other activities,which are relatively safer,this one is the least desirable choice.P4:总结To sum up, chess stands out as the optimal choice for the new campus program, while kite flying is not suitable for school promotion.其他优秀范文参考参考范文2(推荐street dance,不推荐chess):If the school plans to introduce new PE courses, it is street dance that I would most strongly recommend, while chess is the option I would least recommend, for reasons related to both physical effectiveness and educational purpose.Street dance, which combines rhythm, strength, and coordination, offers students a dynamic form of exercise. Engaging both the body and the mind, it helps improve flexibility and cardiovascular endurance while allowing students to express themselves creatively. What makes street dance particularly valuable is that it motivates students who might otherwise be reluctant to participate in PE classes. Moreover, were students encouraged to practise street dance regularly, they would not only enhance physical fitness but also release academic stress. Only when students enjoy what they are doing can PE truly fulfil its role, and street dance achieves this naturally.By contrast, chess, although widely recognised as intellectually demanding, involves minimal physical movement. Had PE lessons focused on such static activities, the fundamental aim of physical education would be weakened. Chess undoubtedly develops logical thinking, yet it is better suited to clubs or classrooms rather than sports fields.In conclusion, it is physical engagement and sustained movement that PE classes should prioritise. Street dance meets these requirements effectively, whereas chess, despite its merits, does not.参考范文3(推荐volleyball,不推荐chess):With four sports activity classes available next semester—kite flying, volleyball, chess and street dancing—the school should carefully select activities that best fulfill the goals of physical education. After comparison, I believe volleyball is the most suitable option, while chess is the least appropriate one.Volleyball stands out as the most suitable choice because it effectively combines physical exercise with teamwork. During volleyball practice, students are constantly engaged in running, jumping and reacting quickly, which helps improve their strength, coordination and overall fitness. More importantly, volleyball is a highly cooperative sport. Players must communicate, support one another and work as a team to achieve success. Such experiences help students develop a sense of responsibility and collective spirit, which are essential qualities cultivated through school sports. In addition, volleyball requires relatively simple equipment and facilities, making it easy to organize on campus and accessible to most students.In contrast, chess is the least suitable option for a sports activity class. Although it plays a positive role in developing logical thinking and concentration, it involves little physical movement. Students mainly sit still for long periods, which does not contribute to improving physical pared with other activities, chess also provides fewer opportunities for teamwork and active participation, making it less aligned with the purpose of a sports course.Therefore, volleyball would be an ideal addition to the sports curriculum, while chess would be better offered as an interest-based club rather than a sports activity class.参考范文4(推荐Street dancing,不推荐kite flying):Given four choices for the new sports activity class—kite flying, volleyball, chess and street dancing—the school needs to consider not only students’ interests but also the educational value of each activity. In my opinion, street dancing is the most suitable option, whereas kite flying is the least appropriate one.Street dancing is an excellent choice because it promotes both physical fitness and student engagement. It requires students to move their whole bodies, improving flexibility, balance and coordination. Unlike some traditional sports, street dancing is highly appealing to teenagers, which encourages active participation and sustained interest. In addition, dancing often involves learning routines in groups, allowing students to cooperate, practice together and build confidence through performance. As a result, street dancing not only strengthens the body but also helps students express themselves and develop a positive attitude toward exercise.On the other hand, kite flying is the least suitable option. Although it can be relaxing and enjoyable, its effectiveness as a sports activity is limited. The level of physical exertion is relatively low, and participation largely depends on weather conditions and open spaces. Moreover, students may spend more time waiting for suitable wind than actually exercising, which reduces its value as a regular sports class.In conclusion, street dancing best meets the goals of a sports activity class by combining exercise, interest and teamwork, while kite flying would be more suitable as an occasional outdoor activity rather than a formal course. 展开更多...... 收起↑ 资源预览