【教学评一体化】Unit 6 Food and health 第4课时 Writing 教学设计-沪教版九上

资源下载
  1. 二一教育资源

【教学评一体化】Unit 6 Food and health 第4课时 Writing 教学设计-沪教版九上

资源简介

/ 让教学更有效 高效备课 | 英语学科
Unit 6课时教学设计
本单元第4课时 Writing: A restaurant review 课型 写作课
语篇研读(教材分析)
【What — 语篇主题和主要内容】 写作语篇为餐厅评论,包含两篇范文:① Doris 撰写的范例,结构完整(Star Ratings + Introduction + Basic Facts + Review of the food + Review of the service + Recommendation),含星级评分、具体菜品描述(bangers and mash, fish pie 等)、价格(15-20 pounds per person)、服务细节(waiters polite but slow, seated 7:00 p.m. food at 7:40 p.m.)、结尾推荐(Certainly recommend... However, get there early.);② 课堂共构的 Lingnan Cafe 范例(Last Sunday, my family and I went to Lingnan Cafe to try some Cantonese cuisine),围绕粤菜展开,包含晶虾饺、叉烧包、肠粉等菜品描述。 【Why---语篇传递的主题意义】 餐厅评论是真实生活中常用的应用文体,与学生点餐、外出就餐经验紧密相关;通过结构化写作训练,培养学生“言之有物、论之有据”的写作能力,落实“用英语做事情”的课程理念。 【How---文体结构、语言特点及功能】 采用 PWP 写作教学模式:Lead-in 通过 Guess the Dish 游戏与 4 维度讨论(price/service/food/environment)激活背景;Pre-writing 分析 Doris 范文与 6 要素结构(Star Rating / Introduction / Basic Facts / Review of food / Review of service / Recommendation),并通过 evidence 重要性讨论;While-writing 采用 Step 1 Plan(4-5 项信息收集)+ Step 2 Write(开篇/食物价格/服务环境/推荐 4 段支架);Post-writing 用 Step 3 Check & revise 清单自评与同伴互评(Heart/Star);Summary 回顾 6 要素;Assessment 自评。
学情分析
自然情况:九年级学生,已积累一定英语基础,能就熟悉话题进行连贯表达,对健康饮食话题有生活经验。 已有基础:掌握一般现在时、现在完成时、形容词与副词的比较级等基础语法;能读懂对话与短文并提取关键信息。 存在问题:对"结构化写作与描述性表达"的训练不系统;用英语写 6 要素完整的餐厅评论时结构易缺失、描述易空洞。 解决措施:以情境任务驱动学习,结合范文学习单、同伴互评表与项目任务;分层任务设计,关注过程性评价与即时反馈。
核心素养教学目标
通过本课学习,学生能够: 1. 语言能力:能识别餐厅评论的 6 个基本组成部分(Eye-catching Title、Star Ratings、Basic facts、Review of the food、Review of the service、Recommendation);能运用 wonderful、fantastic、delicious、fresh、reasonable 等描述性形容词评价食物、价格与服务;能借助 Last [Day], my [People] and I ate at... / We spent... / The [Dish] was fantastic... / The waiters were... but... / I would certainly recommend... 等句式写出一篇结构完整、推荐明确的餐厅评论。 2. 学习能力:能通过标注(label)活动分析范文 Doris 的评论,把握 6 要素的逻辑组织顺序;能借助 Step 1 Plan 的笔记框架(Name & Date / The Food / The Service & Price / Environment)搜集并整理写作素材;能运用 Check and revise 清单自评,并依据同伴给出的 Heart 与 Star 反馈修订初稿。 3. 思维品质:能辨析"评价性形容词"与"具体证据"的作用差异,理解 Specific Evidence(Seated at 7:00 p.m., food at 7:40 p.m.)对增强说服力的意义;能运用 However 给出客观、有用的提醒,形成"肯定 + 建议"的辩证推荐;能对照 6 要素反思自己习作的完整性与条理性。 4. 文化意识:了解英文餐厅评论这一实用文体的语篇特征与真实交际功能,理解诚实、客观的消费评价文化;能运用本课语言向他人推介本地餐饮(如 Lingnan Cafe 的粤式茶点),用英语介绍身边的饮食文化,逐步形成理性、健康的饮食与消费态度。
教学重难点
教学重点:餐厅评论的 6 要素结构与各要素的核心语言支架。 教学难点:用具体证据(time, dishes, prices, observations)支撑评价,避免空洞表达;推荐语中兼顾肯定与合理建议(However, ...)。 易错点:评论结构要素缺失;描述性形容词使用单调;中式表达直译(English-Chinese mixed sentences)。 拓展点:网络评论的真实性与礼貌表达;negative review 的写作策略。
教学方法
PWP 写作教学法、过程写作法、合作学习法、范文分析法
教学工具
PPT课件、多媒体设备、黑板、范文学习单、同伴互评表
教-学-评一体化教学过程
教学目标 学习活动 效果评价
学习理解:通过 Guess the Dish 游戏与 4 维度讨论激活背景;通过分析 Doris 餐厅评论范文,归纳 6 要素结构与各要素的语言特点。 Task 1: Lead in 1. 教师呈现两段英文菜品描述:Description A: Crispy on the outside, soft inside, served with ketchup. / Description B: A warm dish, bright and colourful — one yellow, one red, many families’ favourite.,指令:Read the two descriptions and guess the dishes. 学生抢答后追问 Which one makes you hungrier Why ,引导用感官形容词说明理由。 2. 教师提问:When you’re hungry, will you go to the restaurant or eat at home What can attract you to go to the same restaurant again 引导学生从 The price / The service / The food / The environment 四个维度作答,并把这四个词板书为评论餐厅的"四把尺子"。 3. 教师布置写作情境:The Fine Foods column wants you to review the restaurants that you have eaten at.(Teen Voice 栏目征稿),明确投稿需包含 your experience of eating at the restaurant 与 your comments 两部分,并宣布本课任务:Write a restaurant review. Task 2: Pre-writing(分析 Doris 范文) 1. 教师指令:Read Doris’s review and label the different parts. 学生默读范文,为六个段落标注 a Introduction / b Recommendation / c Review of the service / d Basic facts about the restaurant / e Review of the food / f Star ratings,同桌核对后全班订正。 2. 教师指令:Read after me and guess the meaning. 带读并释义 star rating /stɑ (r) re t /(星级)、bangers and mash / b z nd m /(香肠和土豆泥),要求学生跟读两遍并记入词汇本。 3. 教师指令:Scan the review and answer — When did Doris go / Who were Doris with / What kind of food / How much was it 学生扫读提取 Last Saturday night、Her family、Traditional English food、15–20 pounds per person,教师板书为 basic facts 四项要素。 4. 教师指令:Brainstorm 3 "tasty" adjectives for your favorite dish! 学生限时一分钟写出三个形容食物的形容词,教师结合范文中的 Wonderful, fantastic, reminded me of my grandma 点评并扩充词汇。 5. 教师指令:Why is evidence important 呈现 Doris 的观察 Waiters were polite, but a little slow. 与 Specific Evidence: Seated at 7:00 p.m., food at 7:40 p.m.,讲解 Be Honest 原则——评价既要诚实,又要有具体证据支撑。 6. 教师指令:Would Doris recommend the restaurant 学生找出 Certainly recommend... However, get there early.,教师点拨写作贴士:Use "However" to provide a useful warning to the reader. 1. 观察学生能否根据描述准确猜出菜品并用英语说明理由。 2. 检查 6 要素标号是否正确,关注 c (service) 与 e (food) 的区分。 3. 抽查学生对 Doris 范文 4 维度信息的提取与"具体证据"原则的理解。
设计意图 通过 Guess the Dish 趣味游戏激活主题词汇与感官描述;4 维度讨论帮助学生形成评论的多维视角;范文分析 + 6 要素标号活动让学生在结构层面把握餐厅评论的骨架;词汇与证据原则的强调为后续写作提供语言与思路双重支架。
教学目标 学习活动 效果评价
应用实践:通过 Step 1 Plan 收集写作素材、Step 2 Write 借助 4 段支架完成初稿,培养结构化写作能力。 Task 3: Step 1 Plan(写作准备) 1. 教师指令:Think of a restaurant you visited recently. Note down key information. 学生在笔记本上按四项列出素材:Name & Date / The Food (Dishes & Taste) / The Service & Price / Environment,教师巡视并提示"先想清楚再动笔"。 2. 教师指令:Let’s plan one together. 全班共构 Lingnan Cafe 范例:last Sunday, Linan cafe / about 50 yuan per person / crystal shrimp dumplings, cha siu bao, and rice noodle rolls / The waiters were polite and helpful. But they sometimes served the wrong dishes. / The restaurant was clean and tidy, but it was a little crowded.,教师逐项板书,学生对照补齐自己的清单。 Task 4: Step 2 Write(分段支架写作) 1. 教师指令:Write a restaurant review. Try to give it an eye-catching title. 呈现标题范例 Great dinner in the Black Sesame Kitchen、Pancake House: a fantastic place for Chinese pancakes,要求学生先拟标题再动笔。 2. 教师指令:Write your opening with "Last [Day], my [People] and I ate at...". 呈现范例 Last Sunday, my family and I went to Lingnan Cafe to try some Cantonese cuisine. It turned out to be a wonderful experience! 学生仿写开头句。 3. 教师指令:Write about price and food with "We spent... The [Dish] was fantastic / wonderful...". 呈现范例 The prices were reasonable — about 50 yuan per person. The food was not only delicious but also fresh. We treated ourselves to their famous crystal shrimp dumplings, cha siu bao, and rice noodle rolls. 学生仿写第二段,教师提醒用形容词写出真实感受。 4. 教师指令:Describe the service and environment with “The waiters were... but... The restaurant was...”. 呈现范例 The waiters were polite and helpful, but sometimes they made mistakes when they were busy. The restaurant was clean and tidy, but it felt a little crowded.,提醒用 but / however 写出 “肯定 + 不足”的诚实评价。 5. 教师指令:End with your recommendation — “I would certainly recommend... and [advice]”. 呈现范例 I would certainly recommend Lingnan Cafe for Cantonese cuisine. If you don’t want to wait, come before 6 pm or after 8 pm. 学生完成结尾段,教师抽查两篇投影点评。 6. 教师指令:Learn more useful expressions. 补充更多实用表达,要求学生选用 2–3 个升级自己的句子;完成后同桌互换初稿,准备互评。 1. 检查 Plan 阶段 4-5 项信息是否完整、关键词是否准确。 2. 教师巡视学生写作过程,关注是否使用目标句型(Last... my... and I ate at... / We spent... / The [Dish] was... / I would certainly recommend...)。 3. 抽样检查初稿的 4 段结构完整性、描述性形容词使用、evidence 是否具体。
设计意图 Step 1 Plan 让学生先 “想清楚再写”,避免提笔就写的常见写作误区;Step 2 Write 的 4 段支架对应 6 要素的关键段(Open/Food/Service/Recommendation),降低写作难度;课堂共构 Lingnan Cafe 范例提供完整示范,支架式写作体现"最近发展区"理论;真实菜名与场景激发学生写作动机。
教学目标 学习活动 效果评价
迁移创新:通过自评清单、同伴互评(Heart/Star)与讨论,完成初稿的 Check & revise;完成 Summary 与 Assessment 自我评价。 Task 5: Step 3 Check and revise(自评与同伴互评) 1. 教师指令:Tick (√) the boxes to check your writing, and then revise it. 学生对照 Check and revise 清单逐项自评并修改初稿,教师提示重点检查标题是否醒目、6 要素是否齐全、形容词是否丰富、证据是否具体。 2. 教师指令:Share your review with a partner. 同桌交换习作,安静阅读同伴的评论。 3. 教师指令:Give a “Heart” for a great adjective. Give a “Star” for clear evidence. 学生用 圈出一个精彩的形容词,用 ★ 标出一处具体证据,并在文末写下一句修改建议。 4. 教师指令:Discuss — Would you visit your partner’s restaurant 学生依据同伴的评论口头作答并说明理由,教师抽查 2–3 组向全班汇报。 Task 6: Summary(知识小结) 1. 教师指令:Let’s look back — what makes a good restaurant review 引导学生齐说五项小结:Eye-catching Title / Star Ratings & Intro / Basic Facts & Evidence / Descriptive Food & Service Review / Final Recommendation,教师板书成结构图。 Task 7: Assessment(自我评价) 1. 教师指令:Now assess yourself. 学生对照四条 I can... 逐项涂星:I can identify the 6 essential parts of a restaurant review. / I can use the correct structure to write a restaurant review. / I can provide enough details to describe my opinion about a restaurant. / I can use what I have learnt in this unit in my writing.,教师统计星数并作简要点评。 1. 收集同伴互评记录,关注 Heart(great adjective)与 Star(clear evidence)两项的给出情况。 2. 检查学生根据同伴反馈修订后初稿的改进幅度。 3. 自评 ☆ 颗数作为过程性评价依据。
设计意图 Post-writing 环节落实过程写作法的核心——修改与编辑;自评清单提供明确修改维度;Heart/Star 同伴互评用可视化符号激发同伴反馈的积极性;Summary 提炼 6 要素口诀便于学生形成结构化记忆;多维自评关注学生写作能力的多个维度。
课时教学板书设计
Unit 6 Food and health — Writing A restaurant review 1. 6 parts: Title → Star Rating → Intro → Food (with evidence) → Service/Environment → Recommendation 2. Openings: Last [Day], my [People] and I ate at... / It turned out to be a wonderful experience! 3. Food & Price: We spent... The [Dish] was fantastic / wonderful... / We treated ourselves to... 4. Service: The waiters were... but... The restaurant was... / However, ... 5. Recommendation: I would certainly recommend... If you..., ... / However, ... 6. Key adjectives: wonderful, fantastic, fresh, delicious, reasonable, polite, helpful, crowded, tidy
评价量表
1. I can use what I have learnt in this unit in my writing. ☆☆☆☆☆ 2. I can identify the 6 essential parts of a restaurant review. ☆☆☆☆☆ 3. I can use the correct structure to write a restaurant review. ☆☆☆☆☆ 4. I can provide enough details to describe opinion about a restaurant. ☆☆☆☆☆ (自评说明:5 ☆ 完全达成;3 ☆ 基本达成;1-2 ☆ 需努力。)
作业设计
作业内容 作业目标 设计意图
基础题:Finalize your restaurant review based on peer feedback.(根据同伴互评中给出的 Heart 与 Star 反馈,修订并完成餐厅评论终稿。) 巩固餐厅评论的 6 要素结构与各段目标句型,在 “反馈—修改—誊写”的过程中完成终稿。 落实过程写作法的最后一环,让同伴反馈真正转化为文本改进,使学生在真实修订中内化语篇结构与语言表达。
提高题:Take a photo of your next meal and write a 3-sentence “Mini-Review” for our class blog!(拍下你下一餐的照片,为班级博客写一则三句话的迷你评论。) 在真实生活情境中迁移运用评论语言,用 3 句话完成 “评价 + 证据 + 推荐”的微型表达。 把写作与日常生活记录结合,篇幅短、门槛低;班级博客提供真实读者与发表场景,增强写作动机与读者意识。
拓展题:Try to revise Doris’s review into a “negative review” version.(尝试把 Doris 的评论改写成一个"差评"版本。) 通过反向改写深化对评价性语言、具体证据与推荐语的理解,培养批判性思维与多视角表达能力。 “差评改写”要求学生反向操作同一套语言支架,在正反对比中体会语气、证据与推荐的分寸,实现语言的创造性运用。
教学反思
亮点:以 Doris 范文为载体拆解餐厅评论 6 要素,为学生提供清晰的结构支架;思维导图与句型银行降低了写作焦虑;Heart / Star 同伴互评用可视化符号激发了反馈的积极性,学生修订稿改进幅度明显。 不足:部分学生的 Food 描述缺少具体证据,证据意识不足,推荐理由略显单薄;少数学生在限时写作中仍出现句式单一、形容词重复使用的问题。 改进:增加"形容词升级"词汇清单与例句对比练习;在互评量表中单列 Evidence 一栏以强化证据意识;为不同水平学生提供分层写作支架(完整版与填空版)。
21世纪教育网 www.21cnjy.com 精品试卷·第 2 页 (共 2 页)
21世纪教育网(www.21cnjy.com)

展开更多......

收起↑

资源预览